Biomass Densification for Negative-Buoyancy Carbon Sequestration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of sinking unprocessed biomass with low bulk density into anoxic basins for carbon sequestration requires excessive energy and impractical anchoring due to its positive buoyancy, making large-scale carbon dioxide removal economically and physically infeasible.

Innovation Solution

A method involving drying biomass to below 37% moisture content, shredding it to less than 20 mm, and compressing it to densities greater than 1.03 g/cm3 using mechanical or hydraulic methods, combined with CO2-free drying and high-pressure densification techniques like pelletization, briquetting, or cubing, to achieve negative buoyancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If unprocessed biomass is transported into anoxic basin, then carbon sequestration is achieved, but excessive energy is required and anchoring becomes impractical due to positive buoyancy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon sequestration effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption for sinking biomass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The biomass is pre-processed through drying, shredding, and densification before transport to the anoxic basin. This preliminary densification action transforms the biomass from a positively buoyant state to a negatively buoyant state, eliminating the need for excessive energy input during transport and removing the requirement for anchoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The physical parameters of the biomass are fundamentally changed through the processing method: moisture content is reduced to below 37%, particle size is reduced to less than 20 mm, and density is increased to greater than 1.03 g/cm³. These parameter changes transform the buoyancy characteristics of the biomass, enabling it to sink naturally without additional energy input or anchoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If unprocessed biomass is transported into anoxic basin, then carbon sequestration is achieved, but anchoring material requirements become hugely impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon sequestration effectivenessVSAvoidanchoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The biomass is pre-processed through drying, shredding, and densification before transport to the anoxic basin. This preliminary densification action transforms the biomass from a positively buoyant state to a negatively buoyant state, eliminating the need for excessive energy input during transport and removing the requirement for anchoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The naturally low density of biomass, which initially causes positive buoyancy and anchoring requirements, is transformed into a benefit through controlled densification. By densifying the biomass to a specific range (>1.03 g/cm³), the same material property that caused the problem becomes the solution, enabling natural sinking without complex anchoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Weight of moving object

If biomass density is improved to enable sinking, then anchoring weights are reduced to zero, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffective weight for sinkingVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The densification process is divided into distinct operational stages: drying to reduce moisture content below 37%, shredding to reduce particle size to less than 20 mm, and compressing to increase density to greater than 1.03 g/cm³. This segmentation of the processing into manageable steps reduces overall system complexity compared to a single-stage high-complexity densification system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The physical parameters of the biomass are fundamentally changed through the processing method: moisture content is reduced to below 37%, particle size is reduced to less than 20 mm, and density is increased to greater than 1.03 g/cm³. These parameter changes transform the buoyancy characteristics of the biomass, enabling it to sink naturally without additional energy input or anchoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, cost-effective, and carbon-efficient sinking of biomass into anoxic basins without additional ballast, reducing energy consumption and emissions, thereby facilitating large-scale carbon sequestration.

Implementation Method 1

heating biomass to at least 120 degrees Celsius using the biomass drier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

compressing it to densities greater than 1.03 g/cm3 using mechanical or hydraulic methods

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS20260021520A1Method for biomass processing to enable anoxic biological carbon sequestration
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 JACKSON DAVID TAYLOR
  • US20260021520A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021520A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021520A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for anoxic biological carbon sequestration and the resulting product for sequestering carbon is disclosed. The method includes removing moisture content from the biomass to below 37-percent through a carbon-zero drying process, then rendering the dried biomass in a grinding process to particulate that is no greater than 20 mm in any direction, and finally a densification process that forcibly extrudes the dried biomass particulate through an opening at a pressure in excess of 500 psi and with an achieved surface heating beyond 50′C. to enable self-cohesion of the resulting product so that it stays intact as it sinks down through the water column to the anoxic basin.