Biomass Conversion Process Using Segmented Indirect Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing biomass processing methods in direct-fired single reactors face challenges with low production rates and inability to provide optimum conditions for drying, torrefaction, and carbonization, resulting in inefficient energy use and low throughput.

Innovation Solution

The process involves thermally drying biomass in a rotary dryer using hot gas from a fuel-operated burner, followed by torrefaction in an indirect reactor where combustible gases are used as fuel, and then carbonization in another indirect reactor, with residual gases reused to maintain energy efficiency and continuous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a direct-fired single reactor is used for biomass processing, then the device complexity is reduced, but the productivity is low and the manufacturing precision of processing conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor structureVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The single reactor is segmented into three separate reactors (drying reactor, torrefaction reactor, carbonization reactor), each optimized for its specific function. This segmentation enables continuous processing and improves productivity while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The combustible gases produced in each reactor serve multiple functions: they are used as fuel for the burner assembly heating subsequent reactors and as drying gas for the drying reactor. This multi-functionality improves energy efficiency and justifies the increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a direct-fired single reactor is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision of processing conditions for each stage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor structureVSAvoidprocessing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the processing into three distinct reactors, each reactor can be optimized for its specific function with precise control over temperature, residence time, and atmosphere. This segmentation enables high manufacturing precision for each processing stage while keeping individual reactor designs relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each reactor provides locally optimized conditions: the drying reactor provides hot gas flow for moisture removal, the torrefiction reactor provides controlled moderate heating, and the carbonization reactor provides high-temperature processing. This local quality optimization achieves precise control without requiring complex integrated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If separate indirect reactors are used for drying, torrefaction, and carbonization, then the productivity and manufacturing precision are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidreactor system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heating systems of all three reactors are merged into a single integrated system using one burner assembly that receives combustible gases from all reactors. This merging reduces operational complexity and justifies the multiple-reactor configuration by providing energy efficiency benefits that offset the increased equipment count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own produced combustible gases to fuel the burner assembly and provide heating for all reactors. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external fuel sources, improving energy efficiency and making the increased device complexity worthwhile by achieving energy self-sufficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Use of energy by moving object

If combustible gases are used as fuel for the burner assembly, then the energy efficiency is improved, but the loss of combustible gases as a product deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcombustible gases
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The combustible gases, which could be considered a loss or waste product, are converted into a beneficial fuel source for the burner assembly. This conversion improves energy efficiency by using the gases' chemical energy to provide the thermal energy needed for processing, transforming what would be a loss into a valuable resource.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding the combustible gases produced during processing, the system recovers them and uses them as fuel for the burner assembly. This recovery approach improves energy efficiency by capturing and utilizing the energy contained in the gases, converting a potential loss into a useful energy source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high energy efficiency by using combustible gases as fuel, allowing for continuous processing and producing torrefied and carbonized biomass with reduced volatile content, thereby overcoming the limitations of single-reactor systems.

Implementation Method 1

thermally drying the untreated, pre-sized biomass to a reduced moisture content in a dryer using the hot gas output of a fuel-operated burner assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

thermally torrefied in an indirect torrefiction reactor... to evolve combustible organic gases, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

carbonized in an indirect carbonization reactor... Carbonization removes most of the remaining VOCs in the torrefied biomass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS8198493B1High energy efficiency biomass conversion process
Publication Date: 2012.06.12 SMART TERRA CARE LLC
  • US8198493B1 patent drawing
  • US8198493B1 patent drawing
  • US8198493B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved, fuel-efficient systems are provided for the processing of biomass, such as wood or crop residues, food waste or animal waste in order to selectively obtain thermally processed final products, such as a combination of torrefied and carbonized final products. The processes involve thermally drying incoming biomass using a dryer employing the hot gas output of a fuel-operated burner. Next, the dried product is torrefied in an indirect torrefaction reactor so as to evolve light volatile organic compounds which are used as a gaseous fuel source for the burner. Some or all of the torrefied product can be recovered, or some or all of the torrefied product is then directed to a separate carbonization reactor coupled with a reactor burner. Carbonization serves to remove most of the remaining VOCs which are used as a gaseous fuel input to the dryer.