Hydrothermal Carbonisation Biomass Preheating and Recirculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrothermal carbonization processes face challenges such as high energy requirements, viscosity issues leading to sedimentation, and increased maintenance costs due to the high viscosity of biomass like dehydrated sludge, which limits heat exchange efficiency and reactor volume capacity.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that preheat a fraction of biomass and return it to a mixing station to create a higher-temperature mixture, reducing viscosity and pressure drop, eliminating the need for heating within the treatment station, and using controlled pressure and additive injection to enhance mixing and heat exchange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If biomass is heated directly in the reactor, then temperature increase is achieved, but biomass sedimentation occurs due to temperature gradient, requiring mixer-scraper which increases complexity and maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass temperatureVSAvoidmixer-scraper mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention preheats a fraction of biomass in a separate heat exchanger before reintroducing it to the reactor. This preliminary heating action creates a temperature gradient that prevents sedimentation without requiring mechanical mixing devices, thus resolving the contradiction between achieving temperature increase and avoiding device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The heating process is segmented into two distinct stages: external preheating in a heat exchanger and internal heating in the reactor. This segmentation allows temperature increase to occur outside the reactor, eliminating the need for mixer-scraper mechanisms inside the reactor while still achieving the desired temperature rise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If reactor volume is increased to process more biomass, then processing capacity improves, but residence time increases which limits throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass processing capacityVSAvoidbiomass residence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By preheating biomass externally before it enters the reactor, the invention reduces the time needed for heating within the reactor. This allows the reactor to be smaller while maintaining processing capacity, thus improving productivity without increasing residence time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical mixing and heating mechanisms with a thermal field approach using external heat exchange. This substitution allows for more efficient heat transfer and reduced residence time, enabling higher throughput without increasing reactor volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Temperature

If heating power is increased to overcome high viscosity, then temperature rise improves, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass temperature riseVSAvoidheating energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary heating in a dedicated heat exchanger where heat transfer is more efficient. This preliminary action reduces the energy required for subsequent heating in the reactor, as the biomass enters the reactor at a higher initial temperature, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while achieving the desired temperature rise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a heat transfer fluid as an intermediary between the heat source and the biomass. This intermediary enables more efficient heat exchange, reducing energy losses and improving the overall energy efficiency of the heating process compared to direct heating methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If mixer-scraper is installed to prevent sedimentation, then biomass deposition is eliminated, but reliability decreases due to additional failure points and maintenance requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation reliabilityVSAvoidbiomass deposition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the heating function from the reactor interior and relocates it to an external heat exchanger. This extraction eliminates the need for mixer-scraper mechanisms inside the reactor, removing the associated reliability issues and maintenance requirements while still preventing biomass deposition through controlled thermal gradients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the heated biomass itself as the heating medium for subsequent biomass through the heat exchanger. This self-service approach creates a continuous circulation where processed biomass heats incoming biomass, maintaining temperature uniformity without mechanical intervention and eliminating deposition problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy consumption, prevents biomass sticking, eliminates the need for mixing or scraping mechanisms, and allows for a smaller reactor volume, improving heat exchange efficiency and treatment quality.

Implementation Method 1

a fraction of the biomass heated by the means of heating being returned by a return branch to a mixing station upstream of the heating means in order to constitute there with the incoming biomass a mixture having a temperature higher than the temperature of the incoming biomass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

the biomass is pressurized between the mixing station and the heating means, and the pressure of the biomass fraction is lowered in the return branch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentEP3287510B1Method for hydrothermal carbonisation of biomass, and related device
Publication Date: 2019.08.14 SUEZ INTERNATIONAL
  • EP3287510B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3287510B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3287510B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for heating biomass in motion in an industrial processing path comprising an inlet (1) for the incoming biomass, a heating means (4) and a processing station (5), a fraction of the biomass heated by the heating means (4) being returned by a return branch (R) to a mixing station (2) upstream of the heating means (4) to form with the incoming biomass a mixture having a temperature higher than the temperature of the incoming biomass, the heated fraction of biomass being taken from an outlet (51) of the processing station (5).