Biomass Hydrothermal Carbonization Steam Injection Heat Exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrothermal carbonization methods for biomass face challenges such as high energy requirements, sedimentation issues, limited reactor volume due to residence time, and high viscosity of biomass, leading to increased equipment sizes and maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

The method involves injecting steam into the biomass treatment line at a higher pressure and speed to reduce viscosity and enhance heat exchange, eliminating the need for additional heating in the treatment station and mixer-scraper, thereby optimizing heat transfer and reducing equipment size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the reactor provides energy to increase the temperature of the biomass, then the biomass can be carbonized, but the energy consumption increases and the residence time requires stirring and mixer-scraper installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass temperatureVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system recovers thermal energy from the carbonized biomass output and uses it to preheat the incoming biomass feed. This self-service heat recovery system reduces external energy input requirements while maintaining the necessary temperature for carbonization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The biomass is preheated using recovered thermal energy before entering the carbonization reactor. This preliminary heating action reduces the energy burden on the reactor and shortens the required residence time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Duration of action of moving object

If the residence time is increased to ensure uniform heating, then the biomass is thoroughly carbonized, but the reactor volume must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidence timeVSAvoidreactor volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The biomass undergoes preheating in a separate heat exchange system before entering the carbonization reactor. This preliminary thermal preparation reduces the time needed for uniform heating during carbonization, allowing for a more compact reactor volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the temperature gradient between the heating surface and biomass is reduced, then sedimentation is minimized, but the heat exchange efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass uniformityVSAvoidheat exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical stirring with a thermal convection-based heat exchange system. The biomass is heated through controlled thermal gradients that induce natural convection currents, maintaining uniformity without mechanical intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of energy

If the viscosity of the biomass is reduced by additives, then the heat exchange improves, but additional chemicals and processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes the inherent thermal properties of the carbonized biomass output to preheat the incoming feed. This self-service approach improves heat exchange efficiency without requiring external additives or additional chemical processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy consumption, minimizes sedimentation, and allows for a more efficient and cost-effective treatment process by improving heat exchange ratios and eliminating the need for scraping and mixing operations, enabling a smaller reactor volume and reduced maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

steam is injected into the line between the pressure pump and the heating means. This injection makes it possible to heat the biomass by condensation of the steam.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

This injection makes it possible to heat the biomass by condensation of the steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

Such a method helps to reduce the viscosity of the biomass upstream of the heating means compared to a method that does not include such a steam injection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity reduction:

Data Source

PatentUS10800692B2Method for the hydrothermal carbonisation of a biomass and associated device
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 SUEZ INTERNATIONAL
  • US10800692B2 patent drawing
  • US10800692B2 patent drawing
  • US10800692B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for heating a biomass moving along an industrial treatment line including an inlet (91) for the incoming biomass, a pressure pump (93), a heating unit (94) and a treatment station (95). According to an embodiment, steam is injected into the line between the pressure pump (93) and the heating unit (94) such as to pre-heat the biomass by condensing the steam.