Biometric Access Control with Automatic Alarm Deactivation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional security systems often generate false alarms due to human error or system malfunctions, leading to unnecessary expenses and productivity losses, as they require individuals to manually deactivate alarms after entering secured areas.

Innovation Solution

A biometrically integrated security system that automatically manages access and alarm deactivation based on individual credentials and characteristics, such as functional roles, without the need for manual input, using RFID and biometric identification protocols to grant access and set time periods for authorized access, with warnings and alarms triggered for exceeding time limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual alarm deactivation is required after access authorization, then security control is maintained, but false alarms increase due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm system reliabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs alarm deactivation automatically based on biometric identification and access authorization decisions, eliminating the need for manual user action. The security system serves itself by using the access control decision to trigger alarm state changes without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm is deactivated in advance based on the access authorization decision before the individual actually enters the secured area. The system anticipates the need for alarm deactivation and performs it proactively as part of the access grant process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If biometric identification and automated access management are implemented, then false alarms are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines biometric identification, access authorization, and alarm control into a single integrated system. The access control server consolidates multiple functions (identification, authentication, alarm management) into one centralized platform, reducing overall system complexity despite adding sophisticated capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The access control server performs multiple functions including biometric identification, access authorization decisions, alarm system control, and database management. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate dedicated systems for each function, managing complexity through consolidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If access time periods are strictly enforced with automatic alarm activation, then security control is improved, but productivity is reduced due to frequent alarm interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control enforcementVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts alarm behavior based on individual access authorizations and time periods. Rather than static alarm rules, the system adapts alarm activation and deactivation timing to each authorized individual's specific access parameters, allowing flexible time management that maintains security while supporting operational needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces false alarms by automating access control and deactivation processes, enhancing security and reducing operational costs by minimizing manual errors and system malfunctions, while allowing flexible time adjustments and warnings for individuals within secured areas.

Implementation Method 1

touch less using radio frequency identification (RFID)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency identification (RFID): Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

biometric identification

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiometric identification:

Data Source

PatentUS8207815B2Facility access integrated with other security systems
Publication Date: 2012.06.26 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8207815B2 patent drawing
  • US8207815B2 patent drawing
  • US8207815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for integrating facility access with other security systems are described. An individual seeking access authorization to a facility may be identified with a biometric parameter such as an iris scan. If authorized, the system may allow entry by disabling the alarm system, and a time period for access may be determined based on one or more characteristics associated with the individual. These characteristics may include the functional role of the individual at the facility and/or the location of the facility itself. Moreover, this facility access authorization system may be integrated with a network access authorization system associated with the facility so that when an individual gains access to the facility for a specific time period, the system is also able to determine how long the individual may access its network resources.