Biometric Acquisition Quotient via Genericized Identity Hashing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Biometric systems often fail to quickly and reliably acquire biometric information, leading to repeated attempts and inefficiencies, as existing technologies lack effective methods to address failures in data collection and matching due to the absence of information about non-collected images.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods to quantify biometric acquisition and identification by establishing ground-truth identities, determining image sufficiency, deriving biometric information, converting it into generic form, generating hashed user data, and making determinations on efficiency, effectiveness, and accuracy relative to time, using a computer-readable medium and hardware processor to facilitate these operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If biometric acquisition systems use traditional methods without quantification, then the system structure remains simple, but the speed and reliability of biometric data collection deteriorates due to repeated acquisition attempts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of biometric acquisitionVSAvoidcomplexity of quantification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing ground-truth identities and creating characterization scores before actual biometric matching occurs. This allows the system to pre-evaluate image sufficiency and predict acquisition outcomes, reducing the need for repeated acquisition attempts and improving overall speed without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by calculating acquisition quotients and effectiveness metrics based on ground-truth comparisons. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from previous acquisition attempts and adjust parameters to improve reliability while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the system performs comprehensive biometric characterization and matching, then identification accuracy improves, but processing time increases due to multiple determination steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of biometric identificationVSAvoidprocessing time for multiple determinations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The biometric identification process is segmented into distinct determination steps: first determining image sufficiency, then deriving biometric information, converting to generic form, generating hashed user data, and finally making the matching determination. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently and enables parallel processing where applicable, reducing overall processing time while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary characterization and generates ground-truth data before actual identification operations. This pre-processing creates ready-to-use reference data that accelerates the matching process while ensuring accurate results through pre-validated characterization scores

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system collects and stores detailed biometric information for analysis, then reliability of acquisition metrics improves, but information loss increases for non-collected images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of acquisition metricsVSAvoidinformation about non-collected images
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses ground-truth identities as an intermediary layer between raw biometric images and acquisition metrics. By comparing actual acquisition results against pre-established ground-truth data, the system can reliably evaluate acquisition performance without needing to store or process every individual biometric image, thus maintaining reliability while minimizing information loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of essential reference data (ground-truth identities and characterization scores) that enable metric evaluation without requiring access to the original non-collected images. This copying approach preserves the necessary information for reliability assessment while avoiding the storage burden of complete image archives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11144773B2System for characterizing biometric station metrics with genericized biometric information
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF HOMELAND SECURITY
  • US11144773B2 patent drawing
  • US11144773B2 patent drawing
  • US11144773B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described, and an example system creates a transaction between a biometric station and a user in a group of users. Transaction includes establishing for the user, a ground-truth identity, capturing an image of the user in the biometric station, making a first determination of whether the image is sufficient for identification of the user. When the image is sufficient, the transaction derives biometric information from the image, converts the biometric information into a generic-form biometric information, agnostic of how the biometric information was obtained, and generated hashed user data by applying a hash function to the generic-form biometric information. The transaction makes a second determination, based on the hashed user data, of whether the user is represented in a gallery of sample images. The transactions are repeated for other users in the group. In the repeats, when the image is determined sufficient, another second determination is made, generating a plurality of second determinations. An acquisition quotient is calculated for the plurality of second determinations, based on one of efficiency, effectiveness, and accuracy relative to time.