Biometric Entry System Role-Based Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current home security systems lack advanced features for identifying visitors at the door, managing access, and providing personalized responses, failing to efficiently differentiate between various types of visitors and potential threats.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing biometric data and rule-and-role-based algorithms to identify visitors, associate roles, and perform actions based on predefined rules, integrating with smart home devices for voice announcements, door control, and visitor logging, with access to local, private, and public databases for enhanced security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If biometric data collection and rule-and-role-based algorithms are implemented, then visitor identification accuracy and security management capability are improved, but device complexity and system cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisitor identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments visitor management into distinct roles (family member, guest, service provider, etc.) with specific rules for each role. This segmentation allows the complex biometric identification system to handle different visitor types through predefined role-based protocols, reducing the cognitive complexity of managing identification accuracy while maintaining high measurement precision through specialized biometric comparison algorithms for each role category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining roles and rules before visitor identification occurs. Visitor roles are established in advance with associated access rules, allowing the biometric system to quickly match identified visitors against pre-configured role expectations. This preliminary structuring reduces real-time processing complexity while maintaining high identification accuracy through predetermined comparison criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple databases (local, private, public) are integrated for visitor identification, then security and identification reliability are improved, but information processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts database query strategies based on visitor role and identification context. For example, family members may be identified quickly using only local databases, while unknown visitors trigger queries across private and public databases. This dynamic data access approach maintains high identification reliability by accessing comprehensive databases when needed while reducing processing time through selective database engagement based on real-time identification requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where identification results from one database inform subsequent database queries. If local database identification succeeds, the system provides feedback to stop further queries, saving time. If identification fails or confidence is low, feedback triggers additional database searches. This feedback-driven multi-database approach maintains high reliability while optimizing processing time through adaptive query sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated rule-based actions are performed (granting access, denying entry, announcements), then response efficiency and security management are improved, but system complexity and programming requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where predefined rules automatically execute appropriate actions based on visitor role and identification results. For example, identified family members automatically receive grant access actions, while unrecognized visitors trigger denial or alert protocols without human intervention. This self-service automation improves response efficiency by eliminating manual decision-making while managing complexity through pre-configured rule sets that encode security policies in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing control actions based on visitor role attributes. Different roles (family member, guest, service provider) have associated parameter sets that define their permitted actions, access times, and notification preferences. This parameter-based control allows automated rule execution with high response efficiency while reducing programming complexity through reusable role templates and parameter inheritance rather than hardcoding individual rules for each visitor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If biometric identification systems are deployed at entryways, then visitor authentication capability is improved, but installation cost and technical requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional entryway platform that combines biometric identification, role-based access control, visitor logging, and communication capabilities in a single integrated system. This universal platform approach improves authentication capability while managing installation complexity by using standardized hardware interfaces and unified software architecture that can serve multiple security and access management functions simultaneously, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10309145B2Entry technology for building automation
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS INC
  • US10309145B2 patent drawing
  • US10309145B2 patent drawing
  • US10309145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Managing an entryway for a building includes a computer system accessing identity data providing unique biometric identifications and associated names for respective people. Roles are stored and associated with people. Rules are stored and configured to define roles or people and define conditions and actions. A certain rule includes presence of a person at an entryway and a person in at a different location than the entryway as a condition. A named person is identified by the computer system comparing identity data to biometric data received for a person at the entryway. The computer system performs a defined action for the certain rule responsive to determining that the certain rule defines a role associated with the identified, named person at the entryway and responsive to detecting by a sensor in the building that a person is present in the building at a different location than the entryway.