Biometric Patient ID and Automated Sample Labeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing process for identifying patients and associating biological samples in healthcare facilities is prone to errors due to manual handling, leading to potential mismatches between patients and their samples, resulting in inefficiencies and delays.

Innovation Solution

A biometric identification system using a smart card with a microprocessor and a semi-automatic labelling unit equipped with sensors for test tubes, ensuring accurate patient identification and automated label generation based on biometric data and database verification, minimizing human error and ensuring correct sample association.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual patient identification and sample labeling is used, then the process is simple and low-cost, but the reliability of patient-sample association deteriorates due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-sample association accuracyVSAvoididentification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical identification processes with an automated optical recognition system. The barcode scanner and automated label affixing device eliminate human error in patient-sample association, while the microprocessor-based control system manages the complexity of coordinating multiple operational steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-verification through automated barcode scanning and validation. The microprocessor automatically verifies patient identity against database records and confirms sample association, reducing reliance on manual verification and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual sample labeling is used, then the equipment required is minimal, but the speed of the sampling process deteriorates due to operator requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling process speedVSAvoidlabeling equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual labeling operations with an automated label affixing device controlled by a microprocessor. The system automatically positions and applies labels to containers based on barcode identification, significantly increasing sampling speed while managing equipment complexity through integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning labels and pre- verifying patient information through barcode scanning before the actual sampling occurs. This preparation eliminates delays during the sampling process and improves overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If manual verification of patient identity is used, then the system is simple to operate, but the loss of time increases due to verification delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient identification timeVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual verification with automated optical barcode scanning and electronic database verification. The microprocessor-based system instantly compares scanned barcodes with database records, eliminating time-consuming manual checks while managing complexity through automated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of information

If paper documents are used for patient information, then the system is simple and flexible, but the loss of information increases due to potential loss or switching of summary sheets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient information accuracyVSAvoidinformation management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical paper documents with electronic digital copies stored in a database. Patient information is captured electronically through barcode scanning and microprocessor verification, creating immutable digital records that eliminate the risk of paper loss or switching while managing information through structured database storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP2160693B1Apparatus and procedure for identifying patients and marking containers for biological samples of said patients
Publication Date: 2018.10.31 INPECO HOLDING LTD
  • EP2160693B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2160693B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2160693B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

An apparatus is described for identifying the patient and marking the laboratory test tubes associated with said patient during the sampling of biological material to be analysed, comprising a high-security portable hardware device (1) for processing and storing the patient's data, a device (2) for reading said portable hardware device and for the biometric identification of the patient, a personal computer (4) interacting with an operator and connected to a computer network for exchanging data by means of an application software with a remote means (3) for storing data. Said apparatus also includes a computerised test tube labelling unit (5) comprising a printer (8) for printing bar codes on labels (7) able to receive print commands from said personal computer (4) following a comparison between expected and detected test tubes housed in a positioning and identification device (9) supported by said labelling unit (5).