Biometric Enrollment Sample Size Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Biometric authentication systems face challenges in determining the adequate number of training samples required for accurate authentication performance, balancing security and user convenience, and efficiently evaluating the performance of collected samples.

Innovation Solution

The use of variance-based methods, including mathematical transformations and statistical analysis, to estimate the number of samples needed to achieve desired discriminative performance, allowing for dynamic adjustment of sample collection based on variability and performance metrics like FRR and FAR.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a large number of measurement samples are required for enrollment, then authentication accuracy is improved, but user convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sample size determination based on statistical evaluation of collected samples. The system continuously assesses the quality and representativeness of enrolled samples and adjusts the required sample size dynamically, allowing fewer samples when quality is high and more samples when quality is low, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of sample size from a fixed requirement to a variable value determined by statistical evaluation. By using metrics like FRR and FAR to evaluate sample quality and adjusting the number of required samples accordingly, the system achieves both high authentication accuracy and improved user convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the permissible variability in measurements is reduced, then authentication accuracy is improved, but the false reject ratio increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidfalse reject ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces feedback mechanisms through statistical evaluation of collected samples. The system continuously monitors authentication performance metrics (FRR and FAR) and uses this feedback to adjust the enrollment process, ensuring that the template achieves the desired balance between accuracy and reliability by adapting to actual measurement characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary statistical evaluation and template construction before actual authentication occurs. By pre-processing and evaluating samples to determine optimal template characteristics, the system establishes accurate thresholds that maintain both low false accept ratios and acceptable false reject ratios, preventing accuracy-reliability trade-offs during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If formal methods of evaluating samples are implemented, then determination of adequate sample size is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample size determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service evaluation where the system automatically assesses its own sample quality using built-in statistical methods. The evaluation process is integrated into the enrollment workflow, allowing the system to self-determine when sufficient samples have been collected without requiring external intervention or complex manual evaluation procedures, thus managing complexity while improving precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7809170B2Method and apparatus for choosing and evaluating sample size for biometric training process
Publication Date: 2010.10.05 LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • US7809170B2 patent drawing
  • US7809170B2 patent drawing
  • US7809170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

At least two biometric measurements of a person are collected, then a statistical measure based on the measurements is computed. The statistical measure is a bounded estimate of the discriminative power of a test based on the measurements. While the discriminative power is less than a target value, additional biometric measurements are collected. When enough measurements have been collected, a biometric template is constructed from the measurements and stored for use in future identifications. Systems and software to implement similar methods are also described and claimed.