Biometric Security Apparatus with Automated Deterrent Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security systems face challenges such as delayed response times, costly user interaction, false alarms, and difficulty in distinguishing between intruders and occupants, which hinder effective security monitoring and deterrence.

Innovation Solution

A security apparatus and method utilizing a presence sensor, image sensor, and user authorization circuit to automatically deploy deterrents, such as pepper spray or facial recognition, in response to unauthorized individuals, while avoiding false alarms and allowing remote user control and verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security systems require user interaction to operate properly, then the system can accurately respond to conditions, but the response time becomes costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of security responseVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-registering biometric data (fingerprints, facial features, iris patterns) of authorized users beforehand. When an intrusion is detected, the system immediately compares the captured biometric data against the pre-stored database without requiring real-time user interaction or manual verification, thus reducing response time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The security system performs self-service by automatically detecting intrusions, comparing biometric data, identifying unauthorized individuals, and deploying deterrents without requiring external user intervention. The system autonomously completes the entire security response cycle, eliminating delays caused by human interaction while ensuring reliable detection and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If security systems are implemented with occupied premises, then security coverage is improved, but the system generates false alarms and difficulty in discerning unwanted intruders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidaccuracy in identifying intruders
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by using different biometric verification methods for different scenarios and locations. For example, it may use fingerprint recognition for door access, facial recognition for perimeter monitoring, and iris scanning for high-security areas. This targeted approach improves identification accuracy in occupied premises while reducing false alarms caused by environmental factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the sensitivity thresholds and verification criteria based on the specific environment and risk level. In occupied premises, the system can set higher thresholds for triggering alerts, requiring multiple biometric matches or confidence level thresholds, thereby reducing false alarms while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional security systems are used, then basic security monitoring is provided, but the system generates false alarms and incurs fees from local authorities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasic security monitoringVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical or manual security monitoring with automated biometric recognition technology. Instead of relying on human operators or simple motion detectors that generate false alarms, the system uses fingerprint scanners, facial recognition cameras, and iris detectors to accurately identify individuals, thereby eliminating false alarms and the associated penalties from local authorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of time

If automated recognition systems are implemented, then response time is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by using a single multi-functional biometric recognition platform that can handle multiple types of identification (fingerprint, facial, iris) and multiple verification modes. This consolidated approach reduces the need for separate systems for different functions, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining fast automated response times across all security points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9472067B1Security devices and related features
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 RSI VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9472067B1 patent drawing
  • US9472067B1 patent drawing
  • US9472067B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to security-based apparatuses and methods. As may be implemented in accordance with one or more embodiments, an apparatus includes a presence sensor that senses the presence of an individual, and an image sensor that captures an image of the individual in response to the sensed presence, and that provides the captured image as image data. A user authorization circuit identifies the individual as being authorized or unauthorized based upon the provided image data and stored image data for authorized individuals. An electromechanical device operates with the user authorization circuit to deploy one or more deterrents in the vicinity of the individual, in response to the user authorization circuit identifying the individual as being unauthorized.