Bioplastic Extraction Using Bacillus pumilus Lytic Enzymes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for extracting bioplastics from microbial cells are costly and environmentally impactful due to the use of chemicals like organic solvents, detergents, acid, and alkali, and often result in low-purity products with inefficient processes.

Innovation Solution

A bio-based process using Bacillus pumilus bacterial cells to lyse bioplastic-producing microbial cells without chemicals, followed by depolymerization using microbial cells producing thermostable extracellular PHA depolymerase to obtain high-purity monomers and biopolymers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chemical extraction methods (organic solvents, detergents, acid, alkali) are used to extract bioplastic from microbial cells, then extraction efficiency is improved, but environmental impact increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses lytic enzymes (cell wall degrading enzymes) as intermediary substances to break down the microbial cell walls and release bioplastic granules. These enzymes act as mediators between the extraction process and the cellular structure, enabling chemical-free extraction while maintaining efficiency and reducing environmental impact compared to direct chemical methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If chemical extraction methods are used to extract bioplastic from microbial cells, then extraction efficiency is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs lytic enzymes that can be produced by microorganisms themselves, creating a self-service system where the extracting agents are generated through biological processes rather than requiring expensive chemical purchases and handling infrastructure. This biological self-service approach reduces production costs while maintaining extraction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If drying and grinding steps are used in extraction process, then bioplastic can be recovered, but processing time increases and product purity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebioplastic recoveryVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical drying and grinding system with a biochemical system using lytic enzymes. Instead of mechanically breaking down cells through drying and grinding, the enzymes chemically degrade the cell wall components, directly releasing the bioplastic granules in a liquid medium, thereby eliminating time-consuming mechanical steps while improving product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Quantity of substance

If mechanical drying and grinding steps are used in extraction process, then bioplastic can be recovered, but product purity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebioplastic recoveryVSAvoidproduct purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The lytic enzymes serve as selective intermediaries that specifically target and degrade cell wall components without affecting the bioplastic granules. This selective action allows for high-purity bioplastic recovery, as the enzymes break down only the unwanted cellular material while leaving the bioplastic intact, unlike mechanical methods that co-process both desired and unwanted materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves chemical-free, cost-efficient extraction and depolymerization of bioplastics, producing high-purity biopolymers and monomers with minimal environmental impact, suitable for various industrial and medical applications.

Implementation Method 1

extracting the bioplastic by admixing the bioplastic-producing microbial cells of step A and the bacterial cells of step B and allowing reaction without interacting with or consuming bioplastic from the bioplastic-producing microbial cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic degradation: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

depolymerization using microbial cells producing thermostable extracellular PHA depolymerase to obtain high-purity monomers and biopolymers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP3224367B1Process for extraction of bioplastic and production of monomers from the bioplastic
Publication Date: 2020.07.22 BIOEXTRAX AB
  • EP3224367B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3224367B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3224367B1 patent drawingFigure 3(A)~3(C)

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for extraction of bioplastic from bioplastic-producing microbial cells, comprising the steps of: A. providing bioplastic producing microbial cells comprising bioplastic; B. providing bacterial cells selected from the species Bacillus pumilus; C. extracting the bioplastic by admixing the bioplastic-producing microbial cells of step A and the bacterial cells of step B and allowing reaction. The present invention further relates to the process of producing monomers from said bioplastics by depolymerization.