Biopotential Sensor Impedance Analysis for Gesture Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable electronic devices with biopotential-signal sensors face inefficiencies due to high computational and power requirements, limited resource utilization, and restricted gesture spaces, necessitating the development of methods to enhance the efficiency of man-machine interfaces without adding additional components or detection capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes impedance changes detected by biopotential-signal sensors at sensor-skin interfaces to determine user commands, employing a processor to analyze data from multiple sensor-skin interfaces to differentiate between physical contacts and gestures, allowing for more efficient resource use and expanded interaction possibilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If biopotential-signal sensors are used to detect user commands, then user interaction capability is improved, but power consumption and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial action by analyzing only impedance changes at specific sensor-skin interfaces rather than continuously processing all sensor data. The processor selectively evaluates impedance data to determine user commands, reducing computational load while maintaining interaction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The biopotential-signal sensors serve dual purposes: detecting both biopotential signals and impedance changes. The impedance data, which was previously unused or underutilized, is now leveraged for user command detection, allowing the system to extract additional functionality from existing components without adding separate detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If biopotential-signal sensors are used to detect user commands, then user interaction capability is improved, but device resource utilization becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction capabilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor-skin interfaces serve multiple functions: detecting biopotential signals for physiological monitoring and detecting impedance changes for user command input. This multi-functionality allows the system to expand interaction capabilities without adding dedicated sensors, improving resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The existing biopotential-signal sensors and their associated impedance measurement capabilities are repurposed to detect user commands. By utilizing the impedance data that was previously collected but underutilized, the system achieves efficient resource use without requiring additional hardware components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If only biopotential data is used for gesture detection, then device complexity is minimized, but gesture space is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidgesture space
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds another dimension to gesture detection by incorporating impedance change analysis alongside traditional biopotential signal processing. This dimensional expansion enables the detection of additional gesture types and interaction modes, effectively expanding the gesture space without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Impedance changes act as an intermediary signal that bridges the gap between physical contact and biopotential signal generation. By analyzing impedance variations at sensor-skin interfaces, the system can detect user commands and gestures that may not be captured by biopotential signals alone, enriching the interaction vocabulary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more efficient use of resources and expands the gesture space for wearable devices, allowing for effective user command recognition without additional hardware, thereby improving the interaction efficiency with wearable electronic devices.

Implementation Method 1

determining that impedance changes detected at sensor-skin interfaces by biopotential-signal sensors correspond to user commands, based on physical contact with a body part of a user, by an object other than the body part of the user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Impedance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS20240329738A1Techniques for determining that impedance changes detected at sensor-skin interfaces by biopotential-signal sensors correspond to user commands, and systems and methods using those techniques
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20240329738A1 patent drawing
  • US20240329738A1 patent drawing
  • US20240329738A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device for processing impedance changes is provided. The electronic device receives, from a wearable device that includes (i) a first biopotential-signal sensor configured to contact a first sensor-skin interface when the wearable device is worn on a body part of a user, and (ii) a second biopotential-signal sensor configured to contact a second sensor-skin interface when the wearable device is worn on the body part of the user, data indicating impedance values at the first and second sensor-skin interfaces. The method further includes, after physical contact by an object other than the body part with or near the body part of the user, based on obtaining (i) a first impedance change at the first sensor-skin interface and (ii) a second impedance change at the second sensor-skin interface, determining whether the physical contact corresponds to a user command to control the wearable device or another electronic device.