Bioreactor Process Modeling for Self-Learning Outcome Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting outcomes and modeling processes in bioreactors are inefficient, relying on trial and error, vanilla statistical techniques, and lack self-learning capabilities, leading to suboptimal process optimization and anomaly detection in cell culture processes.

Innovation Solution

A method that selects a process model based on the category of the process, accesses historic and current data from bioreactors, and uses this data to predict outcomes and update the process model, incorporating self-learning capabilities and data from online and offline sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If standardized statistical tools like SIMCA are used for process evaluation, then broad applicability is achieved, but the tools lack customization for specific problems and self-learning capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroad applicabilityVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the process evaluation into multiple specialized process models, each tailored to specific process categories (e.g., cell culture, fermentation). This allows customization for specific problems while maintaining broad applicability through the collection of segmented models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process models are designed to be dynamic and self-updating, automatically learning from new data without requiring manual reconfiguration. This provides both customization adaptability and ease of use through automated updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If multiple parameters are collected from bioprocesses, then comprehensive process understanding is achieved, but data connectivity between different sources remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive data collectionVSAvoiddata connectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sources (process control data, lab data, equipment data) into a unified process model framework. This integration enables comprehensive process understanding while simplifying data connectivity through a centralized modeling approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If trial and error methods are used for process optimization, then flexibility in exploration is maintained, but months of work are required to achieve optimal results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexploration flexibilityVSAvoidoptimization speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary process optimization by selecting appropriate process models based on process categories before actual process runs. This preliminary modeling guides the optimization process, reducing the time required while maintaining exploration flexibility through model-based predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where process data is automatically fed back into the process models for updating and refinement. This accelerates optimization by learning from each process run, reducing the months-long trial and error period while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If human supervision is used for anomaly detection, then flexibility in judgment is maintained, but automated remote monitoring and diagnostic capabilities are absent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejudgment flexibilityVSAvoidautomated monitoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The process models automatically monitor and diagnose process anomalies without requiring continuous human supervision. The models self-update and self-diagnose issues based on incoming data, providing automated monitoring while maintaining the flexibility of expert judgment through model-based decision support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250068794A1Method for Predicting Outcome of an Modelling of a Process in a Bioreactor
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 CYTIVA SWEDEN AB
  • US20250068794A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068794A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068794A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting outcome of a process used for manufacturing a sample in a bioreactor, the process belonging to a category. The method comprises selecting a process model based on the category; accessing historic data related to past process runs for manufacturing the sample; accessing current data obtained from a current process run of the process. The obtained current data, which is based on the selected process model, comprises: process strategy data, bioreactor instrument data, data from online sensors and/or data from offline sensors. The method further comprises predicting an outcome of at least one selected parameter of the current process run for manufacturing the sample based on the accessed historic data and current data.