Bioreceptor Screening with MD and ANN for Substrate-Aware Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for designing biosensors are time-consuming and expensive, and there is a challenge in handling interactions between biomolecules and substrates in molecular dynamics simulations, requiring precise understanding of atomic level interactions and considering the effect of surroundings on bioreceptor-analyte binding.

Innovation Solution

A method using molecular dynamics simulations and artificial neural networks to identify candidate bioreceptors by simulating bioreceptor-substrate, bioreceptor-analyte, and analyte-bioreceptor-substrate complexes in an explicit solvent environment, followed by root mean square deviation and potential of mean force calculations, and feature engineering to predict stable bioreceptors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional experimental methods are used for biosensor design, then reliable structure prediction and stability data can be obtained, but the process becomes significantly more time consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure prediction reliabilityVSAvoidbiosensor development time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computational models to create virtual copies of bioreceptors and their interactions with analytes. Molecular dynamics simulations generate digital representations that replicate experimental conditions, allowing researchers to screen and evaluate multiple bioreceptor candidates in silico before selecting the most promising candidates for experimental validation. This copying approach maintains reliability while dramatically reducing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical experimental systems with computational mechanical models. Instead of conducting numerous wet-lab experiments to test bioreceptor stability and analyte binding, the system uses molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations to predict these properties computationally. This substitution maintains scientific rigor while eliminating the time-consuming and expensive nature of traditional experimental screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate bioreceptor components, then detailed atomic level interaction information is obtained, but handling interactions between biomolecules and substrate becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatomic level interaction precisionVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex simulation system into distinct functional modules: bioreceptor preparation, substrate modeling, analyte binding simulations, and data analysis. Each module handles specific aspects of the interaction independently, making the overall complex system more manageable. The bioreceptor is prepared separately, the substrate is modeled independently, and their interactions are simulated in controlled stages, reducing the complexity burden while maintaining atomic-level precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computational intermediaries such as force fields, potential energy functions, and simulation protocols that mediate between the complex physical reality of biomolecular interactions and the simplified computational models. These intermediaries translate complex atomic-level interactions into manageable computational parameters, allowing precise measurement of binding affinities and structural changes without being overwhelmed by the full complexity of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a multiparametric approach is adopted to consider binding energy, solvent effects, and substrate interactions, then comprehensive biosensor design is achieved, but the computational requirements and analysis complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign approach comprehensivenessVSAvoidcomputational analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing bioreceptor structures, pre-equilibrating solvent environments, and pre-characterizing substrate properties before conducting the main binding simulations. This preliminary preparation reduces the complexity of the subsequent multiparametric analysis by establishing stable baseline conditions. Free energy perturbation calculations are performed in staged sequences, with each stage building on previously established parameters, making the comprehensive analysis more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes key parameters such as temperature, pressure, and solvent composition in controlled simulation steps to assess their effects on bioreceptor-analyte binding. By varying one parameter at a time while holding others constant, the method maintains comprehensiveness while reducing analytical complexity. The use of alchemical transformation parameters in free energy calculations allows systematic exploration of different binding states without requiring simultaneous optimization of all parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250308623A1Identifying candidate bioreceptors using combined molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and artificial neural network based screening
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US20250308623A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308623A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308623A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates generally to a method and system for identifying candidate bioreceptors suitable for designing biosensors to identify an analyte of interest. State-of-art methods mainly focus on interaction of the bioreactor and the analyte. However, interaction of the bioreceptor with a substrate before binding to the analyte as well as a biofluid surrounding the bioreceptor and the analyte greatly influences such interactions. The present method utilizes combined approach of molecular dynamics (MD) and artificial neural network (ANN) based screening to systematically identify candidate bioreceptor with favorable energy profile and feasible interactions with the analyte of interest. The method involves computing RMSD plots to study individual interactions among a bioreceptor-substrate, a bioreceptor-analyte and an analyte-bioreceptor-substate complex. Further, potential of mean force (PMF) is computed for the analyte-bioreceptor-substate complex. The RMSD plots and PMF features are fed to an ANN model that predicts the suitable candidate bioreceptors through feature engineering.