BIOS-BMC Communication Control via Request Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing communication paths between a BIOS and a BMC in high-end servers are limited, leading to situations where multiple communication requests cannot be processed simultaneously, potentially causing OS tasks to be delayed or the system to shut down due to prolonged communication times with the BMC.

Innovation Solution

A communication control method that divides communication requests into two processes: a first process to store the request and restart the OS without immediate communication, and a second process to perform the actual communication with the BMC, utilizing a communication queue and regular interrupts to manage these requests efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the BIOS uses exclusive control with semaphore to manage communication paths, then communication order is maintained, but the OS operation is blocked and system productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication request processing is segmented into two independent processes: a first process that stores communication requests in a queue and allows the OS to restart, and a second process that actually performs the communication with the BMC. This segmentation eliminates the blocking effect while maintaining communication control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first process performs preliminary action by storing communication requests in advance before the actual communication occurs. This allows the OS to restart and continue operations while the communication is prepared and executed in the background by the second process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the BIOS waits for BMC communication to complete before restarting OS process, then communication is completed, but communication time increases and OS response is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication completion reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The communication processing is divided into two separate processes that can run independently. The first process handles request storage and OS restart without waiting for communication completion, while the second process handles the actual communication asynchronously, thereby reducing communication time and preventing OS delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The useful action of OS operation continues uninterrupted while the communication process runs in the background. The first process stores the request and restarts the OS immediately, maintaining continuous productive operation, while the second process completes the communication without blocking the OS.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If multiple communication requests are processed sequentially through a single path, then hardware limitations are respected, but communication throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware constraint complianceVSAvoidcommunication throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically manages communication requests by implementing a queue-based first process that can accept and store multiple requests simultaneously, then processes them through the second process. This dynamic approach respects hardware limitations while improving throughput by allowing parallel request acceptance and background processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple communication requests are stored in advance in the queue managed by the first process before actual communication occurs. This preliminary storage action allows the system to respect hardware path limitations while maintaining high throughput by preparing multiple requests for efficient sequential or parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8782643B2Device and method for controlling communication between BIOS and BMC
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 NEC CORP
  • US8782643B2 patent drawing
  • US8782643B2 patent drawing
  • US8782643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A communication control device controls communication between a BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) and a BMC (Baseboard Management Controller). The device includes a processor that performs a process of an OS (Operating System) and a process of the BIOS. When a communication request for communication with the BMC occurs from the BIOS or OS, the processor performs a process associated with the communication request by dividing it into a first process and a second process. The first process is configured to store contents of the communication request and make the OS restart a process without performing the communication between the BIOS and the BMC in response to the communication request. The second process is configured to actually perform the communication between the BIOS and the BMC in response to the stored communication request.