Bipole Dynamic Braking Control for Neutral Current Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bipole power transmission networks with renewable power generation sources face instability due to unbalanced current flow through the neutral arrangement and DMR conductor, leading to environmental issues and system tripping when the DMR fails or is faulted.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic braking system with coordinated control of first and second dynamic braking units, regulated by a controller, to balance currents between transmission poles and neutral arrangement, ensuring no unbalanced current flows through the neutral arrangement, even in the absence of a DMR.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If independent dynamic braking units are used for each transmission pole, then each pole can be controlled independently for fault ride-through, but unbalanced current flows through the neutral arrangement causing environmental issues and system tripping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent control capabilityVSAvoidunbalanced neutral current
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control of first and second dynamic braking units under a single controller that coordinates both units. The controller receives operating state information and determines a common braking current that balances the currents from both poles, preventing unbalanced neutral current while maintaining fault ride-through capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the braking current parameter based on the operating state of the transmission poles. The controller determines a common braking current that changes according to real-time conditions, ensuring balanced current flow while adapting to different fault scenarios and operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If coordinated control is implemented to balance currents, then unbalanced neutral current is reduced to zero, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunbalanced neutral currentVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal controller that handles multiple functions: monitoring operating states of both transmission poles, determining appropriate braking currents, coordinating both dynamic braking units, and ensuring balanced neutral current. This multi-functional approach consolidates control logic rather than increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If dynamic braking system is activated during transient events, then stability is improved, but neutral arrangement current may cause environmental harm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidenvironmental harm from neutral current
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control where the controller continuously monitors the operating state of the transmission poles and adjusts the braking current accordingly. By receiving information about pole conditions and determining a common braking current that balances both poles, the system maintains stability while preventing harmful neutral current flow through continuous feedback adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents unbalanced current from flowing through the neutral arrangement, avoiding environmental harm and system tripping, ensuring stable operation of bipole power transmission networks.

Implementation Method 1

A DBS is a form of energy dissipation system that utilizes a resistive circuit to divert excess energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12603504B2In relation to dynamic braking systems for bipole power transmission networks
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US12603504B2 patent drawing
  • US12603504B2 patent drawing
  • US12603504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic braking system for a bipole power transmission network including a first dynamic braking unit and a second dynamic braking unit connectable, respectively, between a first transmission pole and a neutral arrangement, and a second transmission pole and a neutral arrangement, of a bipole power transmission network. The dynamic braking system includes a controller configured to determine, based on an operating state of the bipole power transmission network, whether a third current equal to the difference between first and second currents flowing through the first and second dynamic braking units, can flow through the neutral arrangement. The controller is configured to operate the dynamic braking units independently if the third current is permitted to flow, and in coordination with each-other, to balance the first and second currents such that the third current is substantially zero, if the third current is not permitted to flow through the neutral arrangement.