Bistable Electro-Optic Display Update Mode Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bistable, electro-optic display devices require CPUs or image data sources to manually specify update modes and parameters, which can be burdensome and prone to errors, as the necessary information may not be readily available, leading to inefficient image refresh operations.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that automatically determine the update mode by comparing pixels of an image with corresponding pixels of a previous image, selecting the appropriate update mode, and transmitting waveforms as impulse data to the display device, thereby simplifying the interface between the CPU and the electro-optic display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the CPU manually specifies update modes and parameters, then the display can be controlled, but the computational burden on the CPU increases and the interface becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCPU interface simplicityVSAvoidupdate mode specification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The display device autonomously determines the optimal update mode by analyzing pixel data characteristics and comparing current image with previous image, eliminating the need for CPU to manually specify update modes. The system self-services the update mode selection process, reducing CPU computational burden while maintaining optimal display performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the display device receives pixel data, analyzes it against predefined criteria, and automatically selects appropriate update modes. This closed-loop feedback process enables the display to adapt to different image types (monochrome, gray-scale, pen mode) without external intervention, simplifying the CPU interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the CPU determines update mode parameters, then update operations can be optimized, but the time required for image refresh increases due to computational processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage refresh efficiencyVSAvoidCPU processing time for update mode determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The display device performs preliminary analysis of pixel data characteristics and pre-determines the optimal update mode before the actual image refresh operation. By preparing the update mode selection in advance based on image content analysis, the system eliminates time-consuming CPU processing during the critical image refresh period, thereby improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/CPU-based parameter determination process with an automated electronic analysis system that evaluates pixel data characteristics and selects update modes automatically. This substitution reduces the time required for parameter determination while maintaining optimized update operations, addressing the productivity-time contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual update mode selection is used, then the system can adapt to different image types, but errors occur due to unavailable or incorrect information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate mode selection accuracyVSAvoidimage data characteristics information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The display device continuously monitors and analyzes pixel data characteristics, using feedback from the actual image content to determine the appropriate update mode. This feedback loop ensures accurate adaptation to different image types (monochrome, gray-scale, pen mode) by basing decisions on real-time image analysis rather than relying on potentially unavailable or incorrect CPU-provided information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service analysis of image data characteristics to autonomously determine update modes, eliminating dependency on external information that may be unavailable or incorrect. By self-evaluating the pixel data and making independent decisions about the optimal update mode, the system improves reliability without suffering from information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the computational burden on the CPU by automating the selection of the best update mode and pipeline, preventing image artifacts and ensuring efficient image refresh operations, while allowing for easy adaptation to different update modes and environments.

Implementation Method 1

Electro-optic refers to an effect in which the optical properties of a material change in response to an electric field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-optic effect: Electro-Optic Effects

Implementation Method 2

EPDs have been designed to operate using several different update modes... One type bistable, electro-optic display device is based on electrophoresis, that is, the movement of charged particles in response to an electric field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrophoresis: Electrophoresis

Data Source

PatentUS8564530B2Automatic configuration of update operations for a bistable, electro-optic display
Publication Date: 2013.10.22 E INK CORP
  • US8564530B2 patent drawing
  • US8564530B2 patent drawing
  • US8564530B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus embodying principles of the invention includes first, second, and at least one pipeline units. The first unit generates synthesized pixel data from pixels of an image and pixels of a previous image. The second unit determines an update mode by comparing pixels of the image with corresponding pixels of the previous image to determine if at least one condition is true. The conditions may be configurable. In addition, the second unit selects an update mode from two or more update modes if the first condition is true. The pipeline unit determines a waveform for each pixel of the image and transmits the waveform as impulse data to a bistable, electro-optic display device. The apparatus may further include a pipeline selecting unit to select a pipeline from two or more pipelines according to the selected update mode.