Bi-stable Dual Axle Hinge for Object Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portable information handling systems with dual displays face challenges in rotating housing portions over objects like keyboards without damaging the hinge assembly or displays, due to minimal size and precise gear mechanisms that fail under excessive force.

Innovation Solution

A hinge assembly that allows variable distance between housing portions, using dual axle or single axle designs with scissor assemblies, helical gears, idler assemblies, and breakaway brackets to accommodate objects, ensuring synchronized rotation and preventing damage by adjusting axle distances and gear ratios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If minimal size hinge assembly with precise gear mechanisms is used, then device footprint is reduced, but reliability deteriorates when excessive force is applied during rotation over objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge assembly sizeVSAvoidhinge assembly reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge assembly incorporates a bi-stable mechanism with two distinct stable positions (first and second stable positions) that allow the mechanism to dynamically transition between states. This dynamic capability enables the hinge to adapt its structural configuration based on operational conditions, providing enhanced reliability when force is applied during rotation while maintaining a compact form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism changes its structural parameters by transitioning between bi-stable positions, altering the engagement state of the gear mechanisms and axle configurations. This parameter change allows the hinge to shift from a compact configuration to an expanded configuration that can accommodate objects during rotation, resolving the contradiction between minimal size and reliability under excessive force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If variable distance between axles is implemented, then adaptability improves for accommodating objects, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge adaptabilityVSAvoidhinge assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge assembly is segmented into distinct functional components including first and second axles, gear mechanisms, and a bi-stable structure. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently while contributing to the overall variable distance capability, managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism employs nested structural elements where gear mechanisms are integrated within the bi-stable framework, and the variable distance axles are positioned within the hinge housing. This nesting approach allows multiple functional elements to coexist in a compact arrangement, providing adaptability without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Stability of the object's composition

If synchronized dual axle mechanism is used, then rotational synchronization is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational synchronizationVSAvoidgear mechanism precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism introduces intermediary gear elements that mediate the rotational transmission between the first and second axles. These intermediary gears act as synchronization buffers, allowing for slight variations in manufacturing precision while maintaining overall rotational synchronization through the gear train's inherent error-distribution characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge assembly utilizes composite structural approaches combining different materials and manufacturing techniques for various components. This composite approach allows optimization of each component's manufacturing precision requirements while achieving overall synchronized rotation, reducing the stringency of precision requirements for individual parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11829206B2Bi-stable synchronized dual axle hinge
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 DELL PROD LP
  • US11829206B2 patent drawing
  • US11829206B2 patent drawing
  • US11829206B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable information handling system housing rotationally couples first and second housing portions with a hinge assembly having first and second breakaway brackets that define an adjacent position of the first and second housing portions relative to each other and a spread position. The first and second breakaway brackets expand the spacing between the first and second housing portions in the event that the housing portions close over an object disposed between them. The breakaway brackets bias to the adjacent position with a biasing device and a retainer that maintains the adjacent position unless a predetermined force is applied through the hinge assembly at the breakaway brackets.