Bit Priority Interleaving Across Layers With Different Modulation Orders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently interleaving bits across layers with different modulation orders, which affects the reliability of multi-layer communications, especially in scenarios with link imbalances and varying channel conditions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining and coordinating different modulation orders for each layer, then interleaving bits based on these orders to map systematic bits to the most significant bits of modulated symbols, and indicating the interleaving behavior to the receiver to facilitate de-interleaving, thereby enhancing communication reliability across layers with distinct modulation orders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If bits are interleaved across layers with different modulation orders using conventional methods, then the interleaving process can be simplified, but the reliability of multi-layer communications deteriorates due to improper mapping of systematic bits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterleaving process complexityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the interleaving treatment for systematic bits versus parity bits. Systematic bits are mapped to most significant bits (MSBs) of modulated symbols where they receive higher protection, while parity bits are mapped to less significant positions. This localized differentiation in bit importance and mapping strategy resolves the contradiction by ensuring reliable communication without requiring complex layer-specific interleaving procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action by performing systematic bit priority mapping during the interleaving process itself, rather than requiring separate preliminary sorting or classification steps. The interleaver is designed to inherently map systematic bits to MSBs based on the modulation order, so the protection strategy is built into the interleaving operation from the start, simplifying the overall process while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If systematic bits are mapped to most significant bits of modulated symbols, then error protection for systematic bits is improved, but the interleaving scheme becomes more complex to coordinate across layers with different modulation orders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystematic bit error protectionVSAvoidinterleaving scheme coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adapting the interleaving mapping based on the modulation order parameter. For different modulation orders (QPSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM, 256-QAM), the number of bits per symbol and the distribution of MSBs change. The interleaver dynamically adjusts its mapping strategy according to the modulation order parameter, ensuring systematic bits always map to MSBs regardless of the specific modulation scheme, thus improving error protection without requiring manual reconfiguration for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If different modulation orders are used for different layers, then adaptability to varying channel conditions is improved, but the bit interleaving process becomes more difficult to synchronize between transmitter and receiver

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel condition adaptabilityVSAvoidbit interleaving synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the transmitter informs the receiver about the interleaving behavior and modulation orders used for each layer. This feedback enables the receiver to correctly synchronize and de-interleave the bits according to the same mapping rules applied at the transmitter. The feedback includes information about which layers use which modulation orders and how systematic bits are mapped, allowing the receiver to reconstruct the original bit sequence accurately despite the complexity introduced by multiple modulation orders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11387932B2Systematic bit priority mapping interleaving for layers with different modulation orders
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11387932B2 patent drawing
  • US11387932B2 patent drawing
  • US11387932B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a transmitter may determine a first modulation order for a first layer of a communication and a second modulation order for a second layer of the communication, wherein the first modulation order and the second modulation order are different; interleave bits for one or more of the first layer or the second layer based at least in part on the first modulation order and the second modulation order; and transmit the interleaved bits via the one or more of the first layer or the second layer. Numerous other aspects are provided.