Bitcoin Lightning Hold Invoices for Zero Trust Authentication
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing authentication methods are vulnerable to brute force attacks and denial-of-service attacks, with traditional defenses like complex passwords and rate limiting being ineffective, and recent blockchain-based solutions being costly and prone to fraud.
Innovation Solution
The use of the Bitcoin Proof-of-Work Protocol and the Bitcoin Lightning Network for zero-trust authentication and session management, employing 'Hold Invoices' and cryptographic hash functions to secure authentication attempts, ensuring immediate and cost-free settlement, and imposing physical constraints to deter attackers.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional authentication methods (usernames, passwords, API tokens) are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but security is compromised due to vulnerability to brute force and denial-of-service attacks
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces traditional software-based authentication mechanisms (usernames, passwords, API tokens) with a cryptographic proof-of-work system based on Bitcoin technology. This substitution introduces computational difficulty as a barrier to brute force attacks, where attackers must solve cryptographic puzzles rather than simply guessing credentials. The proof-of-work requirement transforms authentication from a simple credential check into a computationally intensive process that deters automated attacks while maintaining user convenience through one-time token generation.
2Reliability
If complex passwords are required to prevent brute force attacks, then security is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in remembering passwords
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements disposable one-time authentication tokens generated via Bitcoin's cryptographic functions. Each token is valid for a single authentication attempt and then becomes obsolete. This eliminates the need for users to remember complex passwords, as each authentication credential is automatically generated, used once, and discarded. The cryptographic nature of these tokens provides security equivalent to complex passwords while maintaining user convenience through automated generation and single-use validity.
3Reliability
If account suspension after failed login attempts is implemented, then security is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to false positives locking out legitimate users
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the account suspension mechanism with a proof-of-work requirement for each authentication attempt. Instead of penalizing users by locking accounts, the system requires all authentication attempts (including those from legitimate users experiencing issues) to satisfy a cryptographic puzzle. This substitution eliminates false positive lockouts while maintaining security, as the computational difficulty serves as a universal barrier that is easy for legitimate users to clear but prohibitively expensive for automated attack tools.
4Reliability
If rate limiting is applied to prevent brute force attacks, then security is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates when multiple genuine users share the same IP address
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces IP-based rate limiting with cryptographic proof-of-work verification for each authentication attempt. This substitution eliminates the fundamental flaw in rate limiting where multiple legitimate users sharing an IP address are incorrectly penalized. The proof-of-work mechanism evaluates each authentication attempt independently based on cryptographic difficulty rather than source IP, allowing unlimited attempts from shared IPs while still preventing brute force attacks through computational cost. The system counts authentication attempts based on cryptographic verification rather than network origin.
5Reliability
If One-Time-Tokens are used to enhance security, then security is improved, but device complexity increases due to preliminary registration actions
Solution Approach 1:
The patent leverages Bitcoin's existing cryptographic infrastructure to provide authentication functionality without requiring separate token generation and management systems. Bitcoin's cryptographic functions (SHA-256 hashing, private/public key pairs, transaction signing) serve multiple purposes: they secure the blockchain network, enable financial transactions, and provide authentication credentials. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated one-time token systems with their associated registration complexity, as Bitcoin's existing mechanisms can be directly applied to authentication without additional infrastructure.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach significantly enhances security by making brute force attacks and denial-of-service attempts inefficient, providing immutable and cost-free authentication, thus protecting users and service providers from fraud and misuse.
Implementation Method 1
employing 'Hold Invoices' and cryptographic hash functions to secure authentication attempts
Implementation Method 2
The present invention utilizes the Bitcoin Proof-of-Work Protocol and the Bitcoin Lightning Network for zero-trust authentication and session management
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention comprises a computer-implemented method for zero-trust authentication and session management utilizing the Bitcoin Lightning Network. A user requests access to the resource of a service provider and the user provides authentication material to securely access the service provider. The service provider initiates a Hold Invoice via a cryptographic function to generate a pre-image hash instructing the user to authorize release a specified amount of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is then moved into the Hold Invoice where it remains during an authentication attempt. A successful attempt issues an access token to log into an authenticated session. The Hold Invoice remains in place until the session ends, then the Hold Invoice is canceled and Bitcoin is released to the user. An unsuccessful attempt or a violations of terms of use, reveals the pre-image, denies the user access, and Bitcoin is transferred to the service provider as a settled payment transaction.


