Resilient Bite Block with Airway Lumen for Transoral Procedures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bite blocks made from hard plastics are uncomfortable for patients and may not adequately prevent expulsion during surgical procedures, especially in cases where anatomical structures like the tongue need to be constrained, such as in transoral procedures involving obese patients.

Innovation Solution

A bite block designed with a resilient polymeric material, such as low-density polyethylene, featuring a thicker wall structure and a higher retaining flange to resist compression and a separate airway lumen to manage the tongue and maintain an airway, allowing for larger instrument diameters and improved patient comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If hard plastic materials are used to provide sufficient rigidity to resist compression, then the instrument lumen can be defined by a relatively thin shell providing adequate protection, but the bite block becomes uncomfortable for the patient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression resistanceVSAvoidpatient discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by using softer polymeric materials with specific Shore Durometer hardness ranges (e.g., Shore D 40-60) instead of hard plastics, while compensating for the reduced inherent strength through increased wall thickness to maintain adequate compression resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite polymeric materials that combine appropriate hardness, flexibility, and structural properties, selecting from various polyethylene and polypropylene formulations to achieve both patient comfort and sufficient mechanical strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If a thin shell structure is used to define the instrument lumen, then material usage is reduced and manufacturing is simplified, but the overall height of the raised lip becomes inadequate to prevent expulsion of the bite block

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidretention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses the retention problem by extending the retaining lip structure in the vertical dimension, creating a multi-level structure with a first retaining lip and a second retaining lip at different heights, thereby preventing expulsion without requiring excessive material throughout the entire block

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If conventional single lumen bite blocks are used, then device complexity is minimized, but they cannot adequately constrain anatomical structures such as the tongue in obese patients during transoral procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidanatomical constraint capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the single-function bite block into a multi-functional device by integrating multiple lumens: an instrument lumen for surgical access and an airway lumen for tongue constraint and airway maintenance, allowing one device to perform multiple critical functions during transoral procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8820320B2Bite blocks
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY
  • US8820320B2 patent drawing
  • US8820320B2 patent drawing
  • US8820320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Bite blocks providing an instrument lumen 62 for use during transoral medical procedures may be made from a material having a Shore D hardness less than 60 for improved patient comfort. An air way lumen 64 may be provide in side by side arrangement to the instrument lumen 62 for maintaining the patient's airway. The air way 70 may have a concave guiding channel 72 for helping to guide the instruments down the esophagus.