Bi-Valve Oxygen Flowmeter Switching to Cut Desaturation Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In hospital settings, patients requiring constant medical gas flow face health risks due to time delays in switching between oxygen delivery devices, primarily caused by the entanglement of tubes, leading to potential desaturation and increased risk of human error with complex and non-disposable switching systems.

Innovation Solution

A bi-valve device with a simple, inexpensive design featuring a casing with a single inlet and dual outlets, operated by a rotatable knob, allowing quick and safe switching between two medical gas delivery devices, minimizing the risk of desaturation by reducing the complexity and potential for human error.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a complex switching system with multiple tubes and devices is used, then more delivery options are available, but the time delay increases and human error risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery optionsVSAvoidswitching time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into a single bi-valve unit that handles switching between two delivery devices, separating the switching function from the delivery devices themselves. This allows multiple delivery options to be maintained while the switching operation is simplified to a single controlled action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bi-valve acts as an intermediary device between the gas source and multiple delivery devices. It provides a centralized control point that manages flow distribution without requiring direct manipulation of multiple tubes and connections, thereby reducing switching time and error risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a complex switching system with multiple tubes and devices is used, then more delivery options are available, but human error risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery optionsVSAvoidhuman error risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the switching function into a dedicated bi-valve unit, the system reduces the number of independent components that require manual manipulation. This segmentation maintains delivery versatility while concentrating control functions to minimize human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bi-valve intermediary provides a single controlled interface for switching between delivery devices, eliminating the need to manually manage multiple tube connections. This reduces opportunities for human error while preserving access to multiple delivery options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a non-disposable switching system is used, then device functionality is maintained, but cross-contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidcross-contamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bi-valve is designed as a disposable component that can be discarded after use, eliminating cross-contamination risks between patients. The low cost of the disposable unit allows for single-use deployment while maintaining full device functionality during each use period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a discard strategy where the bi-valve is disposed of after a single use or patient treatment. This eliminates the need for complex sterilization and recovery processes while ensuring complete elimination of cross-contamination risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple outlets (three or more) are provided, then more delivery options are available, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery optionsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the multi-outlet functionality into a modular bi-valve configuration that handles two primary delivery paths. This segmentation maintains essential delivery options while avoiding the complexity of integrating three or more outlets in a single device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bi-valve provides universal switching capability between two delivery devices, which can be flexibly configured to meet various clinical needs. This multi-functionality approach maintains versatility without requiring dedicated outlets for every possible delivery scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11193599B2Flowmeter bi-valve
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 OXYSWITCH LLC
  • US11193599B2 patent drawing
  • US11193599B2 patent drawing
  • US11193599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes a bi-valve for use with a flowmeter or other source of oxygen or other medical gas, that allows a medical practitioner to easily and quickly switch from delivering oxygen or other gas from the flowmeter or other gas source to a given mask or other device, to another mask or other device. This is accomplished far faster and easier than is done under current practice. Current practice results in the patient being off oxygen or other gas for a short, but very significant period of time, which poses a serious risk of desaturation in the patient. The bi-valve may include a casing, an inlet, and two outlets, with a knob for selecting which output the oxygen or other gas is to be delivered to. The device may be a very simple ball valve device, with the only moving parts being the knob and the ball.