Blackjack Side-Bet With Balanced Payouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Blackjack side-bets are often perceived as unfavorable, with odds stacked in the house's favor, offering undesirable and high-risk options with unappealing payouts, failing to provide players with engaging and balanced betting opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A method for placing Blackjack side-bets that allows players to wager on the dealer or themselves going bust based on specific face-up card values, offering varying payoffs and allowing mid-game wagers when the dealer's initial face-up card is between Ace and King, or when the combined face value of cards reaches certain thresholds, such as between 2 and 9, or specifically 5, 6, and 7, enabling players to make informed bets based on card values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional side-bets are offered in Blackjack, then the house maintains favorable odds, but player engagement and satisfaction deteriorate due to perceived unfairness and high risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehouse edgeVSAvoidplayer engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the side-bet by offering favorable odds (e.g., 2:1 payout) that differ from conventional side-bets. This parameter change in payout ratio and house edge creates a more attractive betting option for players while maintaining house profitability through the balanced nature of the wager across multiple players

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The side-bet is designed to be universally applicable to any dealer upcard value (Ace through King), making it versatile and adaptable to all game situations. This multi-functionality allows the side-bet to engage players regardless of the specific cards dealt, enhancing overall player engagement while maintaining consistent favorable odds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If side-bets are designed with favorable odds for players, then player engagement improves, but house profitability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayer engagementVSAvoidhouse profitability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The side-bet is offered to multiple players simultaneously, and the house profitability is maintained through the statistical expectation that not all players will win. The favorable odds apply to individual players, but the house benefits from the partial action of multiple players where the variance works in favor of the house over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The side-bet is segmented into individual player wagers that can be evaluated independently. Each player's side-bet is a separate contract with favorable odds, but the aggregation of many such segmented bets across the table maintains overall house profitability through the law of large numbers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If side-bets are offered only on specific card values, then odds can be balanced, but versatility of betting options deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodds balanceVSAvoidbetting options
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The side-bet is designed to be universally applicable to any dealer upcard value from Ace through King, making it versatile and adaptable to all game situations. This multi-functionality allows the side-bet to engage players regardless of the specific cards dealt, enhancing overall player engagement while maintaining consistent favorable odds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the payout structure based on the specific upcard value. Different upcards may have different payout ratios or probabilities, allowing the odds to be balanced for each card while maintaining overall versatility across all possible dealer cards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8459650B2Blackjack side-bet
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 LNW GAMING INC
  • US8459650B2 patent drawing
  • US8459650B2 patent drawing
  • US8459650B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A game of Blackjack may include a mid-game side-bet that the dealer will go bust. The side-bet offered may be placed against any dealer face-up card—Ace, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Jack, Queen, or King. The payoff may vary depending upon the dealer face-up card and paid in accordance with a pay table. The bet may be paid when the dealer hits their hand and exceeds the total of 21, therefore going bust. The bet may lose when the dealer receives a standing hand of 17, 18, 19, 20 or 21. The side-bet may be made once the dealer's face-up card has been determined. The side-bet may be asked for at one time similar to an insurance bet or as each player acts on their individual hands.