Blackjack Variation With Zero-Count Scoring To Reduce Rules Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing games of chance, such as Baccarat and Casino War, suffer from complex rules and high house edges, and incorporate commissions on winning wagers, leading to a need for a new game that is easy to learn, has an acceptable house edge, and does not include commissions on winning wagers.

Innovation Solution

A method of conducting a wagering game where players wager on a designated player's hand against a dealer's hand, with both receiving an initial two cards, and the option to receive one additional card, with hand values ranging from 0 to 9 based on a scoring system where aces count as 1 and tens/face cards count as 0, resolving wagers on which hand is nearest to 0, and allowing tie wagers with a payout.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If Baccarat rules are used, then the game structure is established, but the rules become complicated and commissions are required on winning wagers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of playVSAvoidrules complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the scoring parameters from Baccarat's complex multi-card system to a simplified system where cards 2-9 count at face value, 10s and face cards count as 0, and aces count as 1. The target value changes from Baccarat's 9-point target to 0-point target, fundamentally simplifying the game mechanics while maintaining the dealer-versus-player structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the commission structure from winning wagers that exists in Baccarat, eliminating the harmful financial element while preserving the core gambling mechanism. It also extracts the simplified two-card initial deal structure from the complex multi-card Baccarat system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If Casino War is used, then the game is simple to play, but the house edge becomes excessively large making it non-exciting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of playVSAvoidhouse edge
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the house edge by changing the target value from the player's advantage (nearest to 9 in Baccarat) to the dealer's advantage (nearest to 0), creating a more balanced and exciting game while maintaining simplicity. The optional tie wager at 8:1 odds provides an additional parameter for player engagement without significantly increasing house edge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If standard Blackjack scoring is used, then player engagement is maintained, but the house edge increases and complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayer engagementVSAvoidgame complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the scoring target from Blackjack's 21-point target to a 0-point target, and modifies card values so tens and face cards count as 0 rather than 10. This creates a fundamentally different scoring system that is easier to track mentally while maintaining player engagement through the dealer-versus-player competition structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the game into distinct phases: initial two-card dealing, optional third card selection by player, and final hand comparison. This segmentation simplifies the decision-making process compared to standard Blackjack's continuous hit/stand choices, reducing complexity while maintaining engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11992750B2Blackjack variation
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 SMITH AMANDA TEARS
  • US11992750B2 patent drawing
  • US11992750B2 patent drawing
  • US11992750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of conducting a wagering game is practiced comprising: a) providing at least one deck of i) physical playing cards or ii) virtual playing cards provided by a processor to a video display screen; b) accepting at least one first wager; c) dealing only two cards to each designated player and two cards to the dealer; d) determining in any hand has a Natural 0 count; e) resolving any player versus dealer wagers between each individual player hand that has a Natural 0 count; f) the dealer allowing each player electing to take a maximum of one additional card or standing pat; g) the dealer remaining pat within a first certain predetermined total counts; h) after all possible additional cards have been dealt, resolving the wagers based on whether the designated player's hand or the dealer's hand is nearest to a value of 0.