Blade Damper Structure for Recoil-Stable Linear Movement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing firearm accessories face challenges in maintaining precise relative position after recoil, as they experience recoil-induced movements and frictional forces, leading to performance degradation and increased cost due to the need for robustness and large numbers to handle high accelerations.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising two sets of blades symmetrically mounted about a plane, allowing linear movement in one direction while counteracting secondary movements with a second set of blades to ensure stiffness in all other directions, using a multiple porch-swing system to mitigate recoil and maintain precise positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If damping springs are used to limit forces on accessory components, then component robustness is improved, but movement of the accessory relative to the weapon occurs during dampening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent robustnessVSAvoidrelative position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional damping springs with a friction-based damping system using a damping element that rotates on a damping axis. This substitution allows force absorption through rotational friction rather than linear spring compression, enabling the accessory to remain stationary relative to the weapon while still protecting components from excessive forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the damping mechanism from elastic deformation (springs) to frictional resistance (rotating element). By adjusting friction parameters and the moment of inertia of the damping element, the system can control force transmission while maintaining positional stability during recoil events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If roller-based systems are used to allow movement, then linear movement is enabled, but frictional forces cause parts to come to rest at new positions after each shot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement capabilityVSAvoidposition precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces roller-based friction contact with a friction-based damping system that uses controlled rotational friction. Instead of relying on low-friction rollers that still experience static friction, the system uses a deliberately designed friction interface that dissipates recoil energy while preventing positional drift through controlled resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the typically harmful effect of friction into a beneficial damping mechanism. By intentionally introducing friction through the rotating damping element, the system dissipates recoil energy and prevents the accessory from settling at incorrect positions, thereby improving precision despite the presence of friction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If accessories are made more robust to handle high recoil accelerations, then reliability is improved, but system weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecoil resistanceVSAvoidaccessory weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a damping element as an intermediary between the accessory and the weapon. This intermediate component absorbs and dissipates recoil forces through controlled friction, protecting the accessory components from high accelerations without requiring the accessory itself to be heavily reinforced, thereby maintaining low weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The damping element provides beforehand cushioning by being pre-configured to absorb recoil forces before they reach the accessory components. The friction-based damping mechanism is designed to limit forces to safe levels during anticipated recoil events, protecting sensitive components without adding significant weight to the accessory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively reduces recoil-induced movements, ensuring accessories regain their original position without angular displacement, enhancing precision and reducing system weight and cost.

Implementation Method 1

The blades are configured to move primarily in a first direction upon being subjected to a linear force in said first direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

WO2021/244716 A1 discloses a damper system which uses rotational friction dampers (40) to dampen a lateral movement of a cable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12372331B2Device for achieving frictionless linear movement in a single direction and stiffness in all other directions
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 INNO INVENT APS
  • US12372331B2 patent drawing
  • US12372331B2 patent drawing
  • US12372331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for achieving linear movement in a single direction and stiffness in all other directions. As an example, a recoil causes strong forces in a linear movement, but any ridges will produce errors as two units each try to return to its original position. The device is a damper. The linear displacement by a recoil is mitigated using two set of blades, one absorbing the linear recoil, and a second for hindering the linear parallel deflection of the first set by the recoil or for increasing the stiffness provided by the first set of blades. The produced errors are much smaller or none as the recoil is mitigated using the very strong damper.