Turbomachine Blade Shroud with Recessed Pockets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbomachine blades with shrouds face increased centrifugal loads and stresses due to the weight of the outer shroud, which affects the blade root and overall lifetime, and require balanced mass distribution and prevention of creep curling, while hardfacing on edges must be supported effectively under circumferential loads.

Innovation Solution

A blade design featuring a shroud with circumferential webs, recessed pockets to reduce mass, and hardfacing on edges supported by a supporting wall, allowing for a lightweight and balanced structure that distributes stress effectively and prevents creep curling, with additional pockets forming reinforcement ribs for further weight reduction and stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the shroud is made heavier to provide sufficient support for hardfacing under circumferential loads, then the support strength for hardfacing is improved, but the centrifugal load on the blade increases, affecting blade root stresses and overall lifetime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport strength for hardfacingVSAvoidshroud weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud features localized thickening specifically at the hardfacing support area where strength is needed, while other regions maintain reduced thickness. This creates non-uniform wall thickness distribution that provides targeted support exactly where the hardfacing requires it, without unnecessarily increasing weight in other areas of the shroud.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shroud structure is segmented into regions of different thickness - a thicker support region beneath the hardfacing and thinner regions elsewhere. This segmentation allows the design to optimize strength where needed while minimizing weight overall, resolving the contradiction between local support requirements and global weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Weight of moving object

If the shroud mass is reduced for lightweight design, then the centrifugal load and stresses on blade root and disc are reduced, but the support capability for hardfacing under circumferential loads is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshroud weightVSAvoidsupport capability for hardfacing
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly thickening the entire shroud, the design applies localized thickening only in the specific area that supports the hardfacing. This ensures minimal weight increase while providing sufficient local strength to handle circumferential loads on the hardfacing, directly addressing the contradiction between weight reduction and support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shroud is divided into functional zones with different thickness characteristics - a reinforced zone for hardfacing support and lighter zones for vibration damping and weight reduction. This zonal segmentation allows simultaneous optimization of both weight and support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of moving object

If pockets are recessed in the outer surface of the shroud for weight reduction, then the shroud mass is reduced, but the structural strength and stiffness of the shroud may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshroud massVSAvoidstructural strength and stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud design segments the structure into solid load-bearing regions and recessed pockets. The pockets are strategically positioned and sized to remove non-critical material for weight reduction, while key structural areas maintain sufficient thickness to preserve overall strength and stiffness. The reinforced area beneath hardfacing ensures critical load paths are maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the shroud have different thickness qualities - pockets create local thinning for weight reduction in non-critical areas, while localized thickening creates reinforcement in critical areas. This spatial variation in material distribution optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio by applying material only where structurally necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3865666B1Blade for a turbomachine with a shroud
Publication Date: 2024.06.05 MTU AERO ENGINES GMBH
  • EP3865666B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3865666B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

The invention refers to a blade for a turbomachine comprising a shroud (12) which is positioned on a tip side of the blade (10) having an outer surface (14) having at least one circumferential web (16) arranged thereon, at least one pocket (21, 22, 23, 24, 25) recessed in the outer surface (14) and a hardfacing (26, 27) provided on at least one edge (31, 32) of the shroud (12) wherein a pocket (22) recessed in the outer surface (14) is arranged adjacent to the hardfacing (26) and a side face (22a) of the pocket (22) joins the supporting wall (28) with a radius (R) corresponding at least to the length of the shorter extension (28a) of the supporting wall (28) and at most to 1.5 times the length of the larger extension (28b) of the supporting wall (28).