Blast Furnace Stack Gas Injection Reduces Coke Consumption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Blast furnaces face challenges in reducing CO2 emissions while maintaining operational efficiency and extending the lifespan of components, particularly due to the lack of a second level of gas injection which requires modifications that could impact durability and maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A blast furnace design incorporating a second level of gas injection in the stack, specifically in the lower part of the stack, using multiple injection outlets around the circumference, without necessitating significant modifications that would compromise durability or increase maintenance requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If a second level of gas injection is added in the stack, then CO2 emissions are reduced and coke consumption decreases, but the structural complexity and modification requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 emissionsVSAvoidinjection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gas injection system is segmented into two distinct levels: the conventional tuyere level and the new stack level. This segmentation allows the second injection level to be added independently without disrupting the existing tuyere injection system, thereby reducing overall system complexity while achieving enhanced CO2 reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The injection system is extended from a single horizontal plane (tuyere level) to multiple vertical levels (tuyere level plus stack level). This dimensional expansion enables CO-rich gas to be injected at different heights in the stack, creating additional reduction zones without significantly increasing horizontal complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If a second level of gas injection is added in the stack, then productivity and reduction efficiency increase, but the durability and maintenance requirements of furnace components may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveironmaking productivityVSAvoidcomponent durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The injection outlets at the stack level are specifically positioned and designed to match the local conditions of the reduction zone. The gas is injected at optimal locations where it can effectively participate in reduction reactions without creating localized overheating or mechanical stress that would compromise stave durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design anticipates potential thermal and mechanical stresses from the new injection level by carefully selecting injection parameters and outlet positions. This prevents excessive thermal loading on staves and maintains structural integrity, avoiding premature maintenance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Loss of substance

If CO-rich top gas is injected at the tuyere level, then coke consumption is reduced, but the gas composition adaptation requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke consumptionVSAvoidgas injection adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stack-level injection system acts as an intermediary that handles the CO-rich top gas with composition more suited to upper reduction zones. This separates the gas composition adaptation requirement from the tuyere injection system, allowing each level to operate with gas compositions optimized for its specific zone without requiring complex adaptation of the other system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces coke consumption and CO2 emissions by effectively utilizing CO-rich top gases as a reducing agent, while maintaining the durability and operational efficiency of the blast furnace, thus avoiding increased maintenance or shortened lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

the conversion of the iron-containing charge (sinter, pellets and iron ore) to cast iron is conventionally carried out by reduction of the iron oxides by a reducing gas (in particular containing CO, H2 and N2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

combustion of coke at the tuyeres located in the bottom part of the blast furnace where air preheated to a temperature between 1000° C. and 1300° C., called hot blast, is injected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

A second level of gas injection is incorporated in the stack, specifically in the lower part of the stack, using multiple injection outlets around the circumference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow distribution:

Data Source

PatentEP4214341B1Blast furnace for ironmaking production
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • EP4214341B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4214341B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4214341B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A blast furnace for ironmaking production wherein iron ore is at least partly reduced by a reducing gas which is injected in the stack of the blast furnace. The blast furnace comprises an external wall, an internal wall in contact with matters charged into the blast furnace, said internal wall comprising several rows of staves having a parallelepipedal shape. At least one row of staves comprises staves with a hole drilled in a least one of the corners of the parallelepipedal stave wherein an injection device may be partly inserted in.