Blast Plan Control System Optimizing Rock Fragmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drill and Blast (DB) events face challenges in achieving optimal rock fragment sizes, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to either overly pulverized or excessively large rock fragments, which require additional processing steps.

Innovation Solution

A blast plan control system and method that optimizes rock fragment sizes by generating customized blast plans based on specific rock bench and equipment characteristics, using simulation variables and models like the Kuz-Ram rock fragmentation model to determine optimal drill and blast event specifications, ensuring precise rock fragmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional drill and blast methods are used without optimization, then the blasting process can be completed, but the rock fragment size cannot be controlled precisely, leading to either overly pulverized or excessively large fragments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverock fragment size controlVSAvoidmineral extraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and optimization of blast plans before actual execution. Multiple blast scenarios are simulated using the Kuz-Ram model to predict rock fragment size distributions, and the optimal plan is selected in advance, ensuring precise fragment size control while avoiding rework from improper fragmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where actual blast results are compared against predicted outcomes, and this information is used to refine future blast plan simulations. This continuous improvement process enhances the accuracy of rock fragment size prediction and optimization over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Strength

If rock fragments are made too small through intensive blasting, then complete rock breakdown is achieved, but the mineral extraction process becomes slower due to excessive pulverization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverock breakdown completenessVSAvoidmineral extraction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes key blasting parameters including hole diameter, hole depth, burden distance, spacing, and explosive charge weight to achieve the desired balance. By carefully adjusting these parameters, the Kuz-Ram model predicts optimal fragment size distributions that provide sufficient breakdown while avoiding excessive pulverization that would slow extraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If rock fragments are made too large to simplify processing, then additional breaking steps are required, but the blasting process becomes less complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblasting process simplicityVSAvoidmineral extraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and optimization of blast plans before actual execution. Multiple blast scenarios are simulated using the Kuz-Ram model to predict rock fragment size distributions, and the optimal plan is selected in advance, ensuring precise fragment size control while avoiding rework from improper fragmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple blast plan options are considered to achieve optimal results, then the chance of finding the best solution increases, but the system complexity and decision-making time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast plan optimization accuracyVSAvoidblast plan control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified digital representations (models) of the physical blasting system and environment. The Kuz-Ram model and simulation software generate virtual blast scenarios that replicate real-world conditions, allowing multiple options to be evaluated computationally without requiring complex physical prototypes or trial-and-error field testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3543458A1System and method for controlling a drill and blast event
Publication Date: 2019.09.25 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • EP3543458A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3543458A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3543458A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A blast plan control system and method used to control a drill and blast event is disclosed. The system and method customizes results for specific conditions. The system can receive certain inputs, such as conditions of the area to be blasted and the desired rock fragment size, and use these inputs to output a plurality of blast plans characterized by a set of characteristics that achieve the desired fragmentation size. A user can select a blast plan for execution from the plurality of blast plans. When the control system receives a selected blast plan, the control system can generate a work order for the selected blast plan and communicate the work order to operators and/or drilling equipment associated with execution of the drill and blast event. The operators and/or drilling equipment can then prepare for and execute the selected blast plan.