Blast Reinforcement Using Composite Shells and Dampening Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for reinforcing structural members against blasts and other damaging events are often complex, expensive, and unreliable, necessitating a more efficient and cost-effective solution.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the positioning of an interior encompassing member around a structural member, followed by the deposition of a fill material and securing of a force-dampening material, which may include fiber-reinforced polymers and metal layers, to dissipate forces and provide progressive collapse resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If steel or metal plates are used to reinforce structural members against blasts, then strength and blast resistance are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast resistanceVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining fiber-reinforced polymer layers with concrete fill and force dampening materials to create a multi-layered protective system. This composite structure provides enhanced blast resistance while avoiding the need for heavy steel plates, thereby reducing structural complexity while maintaining or improving strength characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters from traditional metal/steel to fiber-reinforced polymers and force dampening materials. This parameter change allows the system to achieve equivalent or superior blast resistance through a different material regime that is inherently less complex and more adaptable to structural members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If steel or metal plates are used to reinforce structural members against blasts, then strength and blast resistance are improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast resistanceVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The use of fiber-reinforced polymer composites replaces expensive metal plates with a cost-effective composite material system. The layered structure of fiber-reinforced polymers combined with concrete and force dampening materials provides comparable blast resistance at reduced material and installation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs thin fiber-reinforced polymer layers and force dampening films that provide adequate blast protection without the weight and cost of thick metal plates. These flexible, thin-layer solutions reduce both material quantity and associated costs while maintaining protective functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Reliability

If traditional reinforcing techniques are used, then some level of protection is achieved, but reliability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-material composite system combines fiber-reinforced polymers, concrete, and force dampening materials to create a redundant protective system. This composite approach enhances reliability through material diversity and functional redundancy, where each layer contributes to overall system performance and failure of one component does not compromise the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The force dampening material is positioned between the concrete and the structural member to provide beforehand cushioning. This pre-positioned energy-absorbing layer ensures that blast forces are attenuated before reaching the structural member, enhancing reliability by preventing direct force transmission regardless of the intensity of the blast event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the structural member's ability to withstand blasts and other events by effectively dissipating forces and maintaining structural integrity, while being more efficient and cost-effective than traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

securing a force dampening material (e.g., polyurethane, silicone polymers, foam, other polymeric or elastomeric materials, viscoelastic materials or substances, gels, fluids, cushions, springs, air, or fluid filled members, etc.) at least partially around the interior encompassing member. In one embodiment, the force dampening material is configured to at least partially dissipate forces originating from a blast event.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce dampening: Damping

Implementation Method 2

force dampening material (e.g., polyurethane, silicone polymers, foam, other polymeric or elastomeric materials, viscoelastic materials or substances, gels, fluids, cushions, springs, air, or fluid filled members, etc.)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 3

the interior shell, jacket or other encompassing member comprises a fiber reinforced polymer (e.g., CFRP, GFRP, resin-impregnated fiber bundles or roving, etc.)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite materials: Composite Materials

Implementation Method 4

placing at least one layer of fiber reinforced polymer around the interior encompassing member prior to securing the force dampening material around the interior encompassing member. In another embodiment, the at least one layer of fiber reinforced polymer comprises carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) or glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiber reinforcement: Composite Materials

Implementation Method 5

depositing a first fill material (e.g., bendable concrete, ductile concrete, other types of concrete, grout, epoxy, sand, dirt, etc.) within the first volume to at least partially fill the first volume.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrout filling:

Data Source

PatentUS8713891B2Methods of reinforcing structures against blast events
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 HENKEL KGAA
  • US8713891B2 patent drawing
  • US8713891B2 patent drawing
  • US8713891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of reinforcing a structural member comprises positioning a shell around the structural member, placing a force dampening material around an exterior of the shell and securing the force dampening material around the shell. In certain arrangements, the method further includes at least partially filling a space defined between the structural member and the shell with a filler material. In some embodiments, the filler material comprises a concrete, a grout, an epoxy, combinations thereof and/or the like. In one embodiment, the shell comprises a fiber reinforced polymer (e.g., CFRP, GFRP, aramid fibers, epoxy, other resins, etc.). In alternative embodiments, the methods additionally includes placing one or more layers of fiber reinforced polymer around the shell prior to placing a force dampening material around an exterior of the shell. In some embodiments, the layer of fiber reinforced polymer comprises CFRP, GFRP or any other type of fiber reinforced polymer.