Blast Resistant Container With Pumice Brick

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blast-resistant waste containers are either large, complicated, difficult to install, or heavy, and lack effective solutions for absorbing and redirecting the force of explosions without causing collateral damage.

Innovation Solution

A blast-resistant barrier and container design featuring a rigid inner and outer layer with compressed pumice brick layers, which absorb and redirect blast forces, combined with a steel cable reinforced belt and corrugated material to manage pressure waves and prevent horizontal blast pressure from injuring bystanders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional blast-resistant containers use heavy reinforced materials like steel shells with concrete filling, then blast resistance is improved, but weight and installation difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast resistanceVSAvoidcontainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite structure combining rigid outer and inner layers with compressible pumice brick material in between. This composite approach provides blast resistance through the rigid layers while the pumice brick absorbs energy, achieving protection without the excessive weight of solid concrete or steel constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs pumice brick, a porous material, as the core blast-absorbing layer. The porous structure allows the material to compress and expand during blast events, absorbing energy effectively while maintaining a lightweight profile compared to dense reinforced concrete alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Strength

If blast-resistant containers use complex multi-layer structures with reinforced materials, then explosion force absorption is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion force absorptionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container uses a straightforward composite structure with three main layers: rigid outer layer, pumice brick intermediate layer, and rigid inner layer. This simple composite design achieves effective blast force absorption without the complexity of multiple specialized layers or intricate reinforcement patterns found in conventional designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Object-affected harmful factors

If blast-resistant containers redirect explosion forces, then protection of bystanders is improved, but structural integrity requirements and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast pressure redirectionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into modular components - outer layer, pumice brick layer, and inner layer - that can be manufactured separately and assembled. This segmentation allows for easier fabrication and installation while the layered structure naturally facilitates blast pressure redirection through its geometric configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively absorbs, attenuates, and redirects explosion forces, reducing the risk of injury and collateral damage by redirecting blast pressure vertically and suppressing fireballs, while maintaining structural integrity and ease of installation.

Implementation Method 1

compressed pumice brick layers, which absorb and redirect blast forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

pumice brick layers, which absorb and redirect blast forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

redirects blast pressure vertically and suppressing fireballs, while maintaining structural integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure wave redirection: Shock Wave

Data Source

PatentUS11629936B2Blast resistant barrier and container
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 AMERICAN INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11629936B2 patent drawing
  • US11629936B2 patent drawing
  • US11629936B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A blast resistant container includes a rigid outer cylinder, a rigid inner cylinder and at least one pumice brick. The rigid inner cylinder has a longitudinal axis. The at least one pumice brick is within the interior of the rigid inner cylinder.