Blasting Coating for Additive Manufactured Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coating methods for three-dimensional objects generated by generative manufacturing methods face challenges such as environmental issues due to solvents in liquid varnishes, increased energy consumption for drying, and the need for multiple processing stations and complex handling in powder varnish methods, which limit efficiency and surface uniformity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a blasting medium with a coating agent, where the blasting medium propels the coating agent onto the surface, eliminating the need for binding agents and heating, and allowing for a single-step surface preparation and coating process, using materials like polystyrene balls and graphite for effective abrasion-resistant coatings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If liquid varnish is applied to coat the workpiece surface, then the surface can be protected against corrosion and given decorative properties, but the solvent volatilization increases environmental burden and extends drying time requiring additional energy expenditure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface protectionVSAvoidsolvent volatilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the coating material from liquid to powder form. This parameter change eliminates the solvent component entirely, as powder coatings consist of solid particles that can be applied and then cured through heating or chemical reaction without requiring solvent evaporation. This resolves the environmental burden and drying time issues associated with liquid varnishes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If powder varnish is applied using a spray gun with electrostatic charging, then the coating process can be completed without solvents, but the method requires the workpiece to be electrically conductive and may form Faraday rooms that prevent uniform coating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating uniformityVSAvoidworkpiece material compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the electrostatic charging step from the coating process. By removing this requirement, the method becomes applicable to non-conductive materials such as plastics and ceramics, which cannot be coated using traditional electrostatic spray methods. This expansion of material compatibility resolves the adaptability issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If multiple processing stations are set up for surface pre-treatment and coating, then the workpiece can be properly prepared and coated, but the space requirement and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface preparation qualityVSAvoidnumber of processing stations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the surface pre-treatment and coating operations into a single integrated processing station. The blasting medium delivers both the surface preparation function (through abrasive impact) and the coating function (through material deposition) simultaneously in one step, eliminating the need for separate pre-treatment and coating stations. This merging reduces space requirements and system complexity while maintaining coating quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides an efficient, environmentally friendly, and single-step coating process that achieves uniform, abrasion-resistant coatings without altering the surface roughness or detail resolution, suitable for various materials and colors, and can be applied to objects with rough surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

a blasting medium with a coating agent, wherein the blasting medium propels the coating agent onto the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy transfer: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

an efficient, environmentally friendly, and single-step coating process that achieves uniform, abrasion-resistant coatings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP2506985B1Method for coating objects, in particular such objects that have been manufactured by a generative manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2013.12.04 EOS GMBH ELECTRO OPTICAL SYST
  • EP2506985B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2506985B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method for coating the surfaces of three-dimensional objects with a coating agent is provided, which method is characterized by a blasting of the three-dimensional object, wherein a grainy blasting material that has been mixed with the coating agent is used as blasting medium.