BLDC Motor Commutation After Hall Sensor Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Brushless DC (BLDC) motors in power tools often cease operation and display error messages due to failures in position sensors, such as Hall-effect sensors, which can be damaged by manufacturing errors or vibration, leading to incomplete detection of rotor position and improper commutation control.

Innovation Solution

A controller-based method that uses a timer to estimate the next transition time based on past Hall sensor transitions, allowing the motor to continue operating even if one or two position sensors fail, by maintaining the same switching element activation until another transition occurs or a fault is indicated.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If position sensors (Hall-effect sensors) are used to detect rotor position for commutation control, then precise speed control and position control are achieved, but the system becomes vulnerable to sensor failures due to manufacturing errors or vibration damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position detection precisionVSAvoidsystem reliability under sensor failure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes from relying on absolute sensor position readings to using time interval measurements between transitions. By measuring the time delta between consecutive Hall sensor transitions and using this temporal parameter to estimate rotor position, the system becomes resilient to sensor failures while maintaining control precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates and stores the time intervals between transitions before sensor failure occurs. When a sensor fails, the controller uses these pre-recorded time interval patterns to continue estimating rotor position and maintaining commutation control without interruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If wired position sensors are connected to the controller board, then position feedback is obtained, but the connections are susceptible to electrical noise, pinching, cutting, or damage from vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition feedback acquisitionVSAvoidvibration damage and electrical noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical/wired sensor connections with a timer-based electronic estimation system. Instead of relying on physical sensor wires that can be damaged, the controller uses electronic timing measurements and computational estimation to determine rotor position, eliminating the vulnerable wired connection layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the controller ceases operation when position sensors fail, then fault safety is maintained, but the motor stops operation and displays error messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault safetyVSAvoidmotor operational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares compensation mechanisms in advance by monitoring and storing time interval data during normal operation. When sensor failure occurs, the pre-prepared timing patterns enable the controller to maintain commutation control without interruption, cushioning against the productivity loss that would otherwise result from shutdown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by measuring time intervals between Hall sensor transitions and using this feedback to dynamically adjust commutation timing. Even when sensors fail, the feedback loop continues using estimated timing data, allowing the motor to maintain operation while still responding to rotor position changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents motor cessation and maintains operational speed and torque by determining transition times based on past sensor data, ensuring continuous operation even with partial sensor failure, thus enhancing reliability and user experience.

Implementation Method 1

position sensors, such as Hall-effect sensors, which can be damaged by manufacturing errors or vibration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall-effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240388226A1Controlling a brushless motor
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 SNAP ON INC
  • US20240388226A1 patent drawing
  • US20240388226A1 patent drawing
  • US20240388226A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates broadly to commutation control of a BLDC motor for use with, for example, a power tool. The method uses a controller to control a BLDC motor in the event of a position sensor failure. Rather than ceasing operation of the motor and indicating a fault or error message to the user, the present invention determines when the next transition should occur based on the time between past hall transitions using a timer. Thus, if one or two position sensors are no longer providing position information to the controller, the controller can determine when the transitions would be changing based on past transitions to continue controlling the motor and prevents the motor from ceasing operation.