BLDC Motor Overload Detection via Angle Difference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting overload and stalling in brushless direct current (BLDC) motors, especially those using sensorless vector control, face challenges in accurately determining motor stalling without increasing device costs and continuously flowing current, making it difficult to detect stalling conditions effectively.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that measure the difference between electrical and mechanical angles of the BLDC motor using a regulator angle without a separate rotor position detection sensor, determining motor stalling by counting errors and controlling the motor velocity to 0 when the difference exceeds a predetermined threshold, allowing for accurate overload detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a position detection sensor device (hall sensor, encoder) is used to detect rotor position, then the accuracy of motor control is improved, but the device cost is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position detection accuracyVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the rotor position detection function from separate sensor devices and implements it through sensorless vector control using only the existing three-phase current sensors. By measuring back-EMF voltages and calculating rotor position through software algorithms rather than hardware sensors, the solution eliminates additional cost while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own three-phase current sensing capability to simultaneously perform both motor control and rotor position detection functions. The current sensors serve dual purposes: controlling motor operation and detecting rotor position through back-EMF analysis, eliminating the need for separate position detection sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If sensorless vector control is used to reduce device cost, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to accurately detect stalling is worsened because current continues to flow during stalling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice costVSAvoidstalling detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors the difference between electrical angle (from back-EMF measurement) and mechanical angle (from current-based estimation). When the motor stalls, this angle difference deviates from the normal 90-degree relationship, providing a clear feedback signal for stalling detection even though current continues to flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent detects stalling by monitoring changes in the angle difference parameter between electrical and mechanical angles. During normal operation, this difference remains at 90 degrees, but during stalling, the parameter changes significantly, providing a reliable detection criterion without requiring additional sensors or interrupting current flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the difference between electrical angle and mechanical angle is continuously monitored to detect stalling, then the stalling detection accuracy is improved, but the processing complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestalling detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent monitors the angle difference parameter continuously but only triggers stalling detection when the difference exceeds a predetermined threshold. This partial monitoring approach focuses computational resources on the critical detection moment rather than processing all angle data equally, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate detection of motor stalling and overload conditions without additional sensors, reducing costs and improving stalling detection accuracy by controlling the motor velocity to prevent further damage.

Implementation Method 1

a sensorless method using a back electro motive force (BEMF) method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBack electromotive force (BEMF): Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a mechanical angle of the BLDC motor, estimated through current supplied to the BLDC motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic relationship between current and rotor position: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11451183B2Apparatus and method for detecting BLDC motor overload
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11451183B2 patent drawing
  • US11451183B2 patent drawing
  • US11451183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a brushless direct current (BLDC) motor overload detection apparatus. The BLDC motor overload detection apparatus includes a measurer for measuring an electrical angle of the BLDC motor, a determiner for determining whether a difference between the electrical angle measured by the measurer and a mechanical angle of the BLDC motor, estimated through current supplied to the BLDC motor, is within a predetermined range, and a driving controller for control of driving of the BLDC motor according to whether the BLDC motor stalls, determined by the determiner.