BLE IoT Tag Near-Field Testing for RF Path Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current testing methods for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) devices, such as battery-less IoT tags, fail to accurately assess functionality due to interference from multiple tags responding simultaneously in far-field over-the-air testing, and conductive testing does not test the full RF path.

Innovation Solution

A near-field testing system using a near-field antenna and a fixture to position the BLE device within a partly open chamber, allowing individual testing of each tag's harvesting antenna and communication antenna, with synchronized signal transmission and reception to determine charging time and data rate, and using signal strength analysis to filter out interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If far-field over-the-air testing is used, then testing can be performed without direct electrical connection, but multiple tags respond simultaneously causing interference and inaccurate results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting operationVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system segments the testing process by using a conveyor belt to position tags individually in the near-field zone, ensuring only one tag is tested at a time. This eliminates simultaneous responses from multiple tags and enables accurate individual measurement while maintaining operational efficiency through automated sequential testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If conductive testing method is used, then direct electrical connection is established for testing, but the full RF path is not tested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidRF path testing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the advantages of both conductive and far-field testing methods by using near-field coupling. This allows direct electrical connection for accurate measurement while simultaneously testing the complete RF path including antenna performance, energy harvesting capability, and wireless communication functionality in an integrated manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If multiple tags are tested simultaneously, then productivity increases, but interference from multiple tags responding causes measurement errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic testing by moving tags through the near-field zone on a conveyor belt at controlled speeds. This enables continuous high-throughput testing while maintaining measurement accuracy through automated sequential processing. The dynamic movement allows multiple tags to be tested in rapid succession without simultaneous interference, achieving both high productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If tags are arranged on reels for mass production, then manufacturing efficiency is maintained, but close spacing causes multiple tags to respond in far-field testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass production capabilityVSAvoidinterference from adjacent tags
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The near-field zone acts as an intermediary testing zone between the tags on reels and the testing system. By positioning the testing antenna in the near-field region, the system creates a localized testing environment that isolates each tag from its neighbors on the reel, eliminating harmful interference while maintaining the ability to test tags in their mass-proDUCTION configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures accurate and efficient testing of BLE devices by minimizing interference and assessing the full RF path, enabling reliable functionality evaluation and reducing testing time and infrastructure size.

Implementation Method 1

Additional one or more antennas and other components may be included for use in harvesting energy, e.g., RF energy harvesting, to power the tag's operation. Energy harvesting allows a tag to operate without requiring a battery source or other external power supply by using over-the-air signals to charge a capacitor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic energy harvesting: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Bluetooth® and Bluetooth low energy (BLE) are personal area network protocols that support wireless connectivity over the 2.4 GHz industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) band

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency transmission: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12352805B2System and method for testing IoT tags
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 WILIOT LTD
  • US12352805B2 patent drawing
  • US12352805B2 patent drawing
  • US12352805B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for testing a wireless tag that has an antenna for wireless communication and employs a low energy wireless communication protocol. The system includes a near field antenna; and a fixture for positioning the wireless tag to be tested so that the at least one antenna for wireless communication of the at least one wireless tag to be tested is within a near field of the near field antenna of the system; wherein when the wireless tag is positioned by the fixture, it is within an at least a partly open chamber. The method comprises supplying, via the near field antenna of the system, a test signal for receipt by the antenna of the wireless tag; and comparing a received signal strength of a response from the wireless tag in response to the test signal to an expected benchmark.