Bleed Air Flow Rate Difference Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft bleed air systems require reactive maintenance only after faults occur, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to unscheduled downtime and difficulty in identifying issues proactively.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the transmission of bleed air flow rates from multiple engines, calculation of differences, comparison to a reference value, and fault detection by a controller to provide timely indications of system faults, enabling proactive maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If reactive maintenance is used (waiting for faults to occur), then maintenance costs and operational complexity are reduced, but aircraft downtime and loss of time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft downtimeVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and analysis of bleed air flow rates before faults actually occur. By continuously comparing actual flow rates against expected values and identifying deviations early, the system enables proactive maintenance scheduling, reducing aircraft downtime while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If continuous monitoring and fault detection systems are implemented, then reliability and productivity improve, but device complexity and measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebleed air system reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by leveraging existing engine performance data and bleed air flow rate measurements that are already available from standard sensors. Rather than installing complex new monitoring equipment, the system processes existing data to detect faults, thereby improving reliability without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If proactive fault detection is implemented, then productivity and reliability improve, but measurement precision requirements and difficulty of detecting increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidflow rate measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring by focusing specifically on bleed air flow rate deviations rather than attempting to monitor all system parameters with high precision. By concentrating measurement efforts on the most critical parameter (flow rate differences), the system achieves effective fault detection without requiring excessive measurement precision across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10008051B2Method for detecting a bleed air system fault
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 GE AVIATION SYST LTD
  • US10008051B2 patent drawing
  • US10008051B2 patent drawing
  • US10008051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of detecting a fault in a bleed air system of an aircraft having multiple engines is disclosed. The method includes transmitting a bleed air flow rate from multiple engines, determining a difference between the transmitted bleed air flow rates to define a difference value, and determining, by a controller, a fault condition with the bleed air system based on the difference value.