Blended Cement Composition Reducing Cost While Maintaining Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing concrete compositions for block paving applications often lack sufficient strength and durability to withstand heavy traffic and weathering, and there is a need for high-strength mixes with a low cost factor.

Innovation Solution

A cement composition comprising a blend of Portland Cement and a cement alternative, such as limestone powder, in a ratio of 48:52 to 50:50 by weight, which provides excellent strength and density characteristics while reducing the cost of concrete production by partially replacing expensive cement with a cheaper alternative.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If cement content is increased to improve strength, then concrete strength improves, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcrete strengthVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining cement with limestone powder in a specific ratio (48:52 to 50:50 by weight). This composite cement composition leverages the complementary properties of both materials - cement provides binding strength while limestone powder contributes to density and cost-effectiveness, achieving high-strength concrete at reduced cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the compositional parameters of the cement by incorporating limestone powder at 48-52% by weight. This parameter change transforms the traditional cement composition into a blended cement system that maintains or enhances strength properties while reducing dependency on expensive pure cement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If cement is replaced with cheaper alternatives, then production cost decreases, but concrete strength and durability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidconcrete strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the replacement parameter by limiting limestone powder content to 48-52% by weight, ensuring that enough cement remains to provide adequate binding strength. This controlled parameter change allows cost reduction while preventing strength deterioration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a synergistic composite where limestone powder (48-52% by weight) complements cement rather than merely replacing it. The specific composition ratio ensures that the composite material achieves both cost-effectiveness and required mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If high cement content is used to achieve high strength, then concrete withstands heavy loads better, but cost factor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidcost factor
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a composite cement system where limestone powder (48-52% by weight) enhances the load-bearing capacity contribution per unit cost. The composite structure allows the concrete to withstand heavy loads effectively while the blended composition reduces the cost factor compared to 100% cement formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP2435380B1Concrete compositions
Publication Date: 2019.09.18 MARSHALLS MONO

AI summary

A cement composition for use in a concrete composition, the cement composition comprising: cement; at least one cement alternative; wherein the or each cement alternative is a powder, and wherein the cement and the cement alternative are present relative to each other in an amount of between about 40:60 (in % by weight) and 60:40 (in % by weight).