Blended IPPI Control for Voltage Source Converter Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional PI-based controllers in voltage source converters (VSCs) face challenges in maintaining stability and transient behavior under varying operating conditions, leading to potential instability and overshoot, which can stress system components and violate operational limits.

Innovation Solution

A blended integral-proportional/proportional-integral (IPPI) controller is introduced, combining PI and IP control through an optimized blending factor α, enhancing damping characteristics and stability by independently optimizing responses to input commands and disturbances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a conventional PI controller is used in a voltage source converter, then the control structure is simple and easy to implement, but the system experiences large overshoot and sluggish response which can lead to instability and violate operational limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller implementation simplicityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines PI and IP controllers into a unified blended controller structure where the control signal is formed by weighting the outputs of both PI and IP controllers. This merging allows the system to leverage the simplicity of PI control while incorporating the superior transient response and reduced overshoot characteristics of IP control, thereby resolving the contradiction between implementation simplicity and system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a blending factor parameter that dynamically adjusts the relative contribution of PI and IP control components. By optimizing this parameter, the controller can adapt its characteristics to achieve both simplicity and stability - maintaining ease of implementation while ensuring reliable operation under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a PI controller is used, then the controller structure is straightforward, but the response to disturbances is slow and the proportional and integral coefficients are sensitive requiring careful tuning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller structureVSAvoidtransient response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blended controller merges the straightforward structure of PI control with the faster disturbance rejection capability of IP control. The resulting structure remains relatively simple while achieving improved transient response performance through the complementary action of both control modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If an IP controller is used instead of PI, then the overshoot is reduced and stability is improved, but the rise time increases indicating a slower response to input commands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the stability advantages of IP control with the fast response characteristics of PI control. The blended structure allows the system to achieve both reduced overshoot and maintained response speed by appropriately weighting the contributions of each control mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

By adjusting the blending factor parameter, the controller can optimize the trade-off between stability and response speed. This parameter change enables the system to achieve improved stability while maintaining acceptable transient response performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If a PI controller is designed for one operating condition, then the controller is optimized for that specific condition, but it does not perform well under other operating conditions particularly near operational limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidoperating condition range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The blended IPPI controller achieves multi-functionality by incorporating both PI and IP control mechanisms. This universal structure allows the controller to effectively handle a wide range of operating conditions, from normal operation to near-limit scenarios, by leveraging the strengths of both control modes across different operating regimes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250219552A1System and method for blended integral-proportional/proportional-integral (IPPI) controllers for voltage source converters
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US20250219552A1 patent drawing
  • US20250219552A1 patent drawing
  • US20250219552A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An integral-proportional (IP)/proportional-integral (PI) (IPPI) controller is blended through a single parameter for voltage and current control. When the parameter is optimized, the IPPI controller delivers a superior transient response, improved stability margins, and wider operating ranges for voltage source converters (VSCs) in comparison to conventional standalone PI controllers.