Blender Container Geometry and Spout Sealing for Quieter Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional blender containers are inefficient in blending due to their round or square shapes, lead to noise from the blender, and have issues with material discharge through the pouring spout, with the spout often being inadequately closed during blending.

Innovation Solution

A blender container with an arcuate wall and intersecting straight walls positioned to align the axis of rotation closer to the arcuate wall, a noise-baffling skirt with fingers, and a pouring spout located approximately 20-30% from the top, along with a cover that completely seals the spout using a plug assembly and lock flaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional round or square container configurations are used, then manufacturing is simple, but blending efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblending efficiencyVSAvoidcontainer shape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container employs an asymmetric configuration with one arcuate wall and three straight walls, creating an irregular polygonal cross-section. This asymmetric shape optimizes blending efficiency by positioning the rotation axis closer to the arcuate wall, enhancing material circulation patterns while maintaining manufacturability through simple geometric forms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Productivity

If the pouring spout is positioned at the top rim, then discharge is accessible, but material congesion occurs and discharge is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial discharge efficiencyVSAvoidpouring accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The pouring spout is repositioned from the traditional top rim location to a lower position on the container wall, approximately 20-30% of the height from the top. This dimensional repositioning allows material to discharge at an optimal point in the blending cycle, reducing congregation and improving discharge efficiency while maintaining accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the spout is left open during blending, then pouring is accessible, but noise from the blade increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidspout accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The container cover is designed with dual functionality: it seals the container opening during blending operations to reduce noise from the rotating blade, and simultaneously provides access to the pouring spout when needed. This multi-functional design allows the same component to serve both noise reduction and pouring accessibility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the cover only seals the container opening, then structure is simple, but the spout remains open and material can be misdirected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespout sealing reliabilityVSAvoidcover structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cover structure is segmented to include separate functional elements: a main body that seals the container opening and an integrated spout closure mechanism. This segmentation allows the cover to independently perform both the container sealing function and the spout sealing function, ensuring reliable spout closure without requiring a completely redesigned cover structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances blending efficiency, reduces noise by directing sound waves sinuously, and ensures efficient material discharge by positioning the spout for optimal flow and sealing the spout during blending.

Implementation Method 1

Fingers extend from the skirt into the opening and are spaced from each other to baffle the noise of the blender

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound wave baffling: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentUS8814011B2Blender container and cover
Publication Date: 2014.08.26 VITA MIX MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
  • US8814011B2 patent drawing
  • US8814011B2 patent drawing
  • US8814011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A container (11) for a blender includes a base surface (13) and a blade (20) which is rotatable on an axis above the base surface (13). An arcuate wall (14) and two generally straight walls (15, 16) extend upwardly from the base surface (13) and terminate at the upper end of container (11). The axis of rotation of the blade (20) is closer to the arcuate wall (14) than it is to the generally straight walls (15, 16). A skirt (25) extends downwardly from the base surface (13) and has an opening. Sound baffling fingers (32) extend from the skirt (25) and into the opening. A spout (40) is formed at the intersection of two of the walls (14, 15, 16), the spout (40) having an entry point located approximately twenty to thirty percent of the height of the walls (14, 15, 16) from the upper end of the container (11). A handle (34) is positioned opposite to the spout (40) and a cover (12) includes a plug (55) to close the spout (40).