Blind Closing Auction With Fixed Phases and Imbalance Messaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing financial exchange systems face challenges in managing high volumes of trades during market openings and closings, leading to volatility, imbalance, and inefficient resource allocation due to unpredictable closing times and order processing spikes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-staged blind auction with defined phases and rules for order acceptance and cancellation, combined with a fixed closing time and periodic imbalance messages, to ensure fair and efficient market participation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If continuous trading is allowed during auction phases, then market liquidity is improved, but system resource allocation becomes inefficient due to unpredictable order volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket liquidityVSAvoidsystem resource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The trading session is segmented into distinct phases: continuous trading phase and auction phase (opening/closing). During continuous trading, orders are processed in real-time. During auction phases, the system transitions to batch processing with fixed start and end times. This segmentation allows the system to allocate resources efficiently by predicting high volume periods (continuous trading) versus consolidation periods (auction), resolving the contradiction between maintaining liquidity and optimizing resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If closing time is randomized, then market fairness is improved, but system predictability and resource planning deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket fairnessVSAvoidsystem predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing fixed, predetermined auction times (e.g., 9:30-9:35 AM for opening, 4:00-4:05 PM for closing) before the trading session begins. This allows the exchange system to pre-allocate computational resources, scale infrastructure appropriately, and notify participants in advance. The fixed timing eliminates the unpredictability of randomized closing while maintaining fairness through transparent, rule-based auction mechanics executed at known times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If all order types are accepted during auction, then market participation is improved, but order processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket participationVSAvoidorder processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by implementing different order type acceptances for different auction phases. For example, during the opening auction, only specific order types (e.g., market orders, limit orders) are accepted, while other complex order types are restricted. During closing auction, similar phase-specific restrictions apply. This localized approach to order type validation maintains broad market participation while reducing processing complexity by eliminating unnecessary validation logic for restricted order types during specific phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If auction duration is extended, then order matching completeness is improved, but system load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder matching completenessVSAvoidauction duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuity of useful action by implementing an extended trading session that operates continuously alongside the auction. During the auction phase, matching continues for orders that meet auction criteria, while non-auction orders continue to be processed in the extended trading session. This parallel continuous processing ensures complete order matching without extending the core auction duration, thereby maintaining matching completeness while avoiding increased system load from sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250225574A1Closing Auction
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 CBOE EXCHANGE INC
  • US20250225574A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225574A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225574A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system having one or more non-transitory computer storage media having instructions that, when executed, cause one or more computers to receiving at least one message. Each message including a requested order to be executed during a blind auction. A filter can be applied during a plurality of auction periods to permit one or more requested orders that have an order type satisfying an order type criterion defined for a current auction period. The permitted one or more requested orders are to be processed during a closing period of the blind auction. In response to determining that an imbalance period has started, one or more imbalance messages can be generated using a reference model. During a closing period, the blind auction can be closed based on the permitted one or more orders and using a matching criterion.