Blind Interface Joint for Monolithic Aircraft Spar Assemblies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft components with high aspect ratios present challenges in joining due to mechanical strength requirements and the difficulty in using mechanical fasteners, especially when different materials are involved.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic structure with a Y-shaped spar fitting end and a fitting element with blades that mate within the channel of the spar fitting end, allowing for a bonded joint without mechanical fasteners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If mechanical fasteners (screws, bolts) are used to join components, then mechanical strength is improved, but the complexity of the joint and difficulty of installation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidjoint complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical fastening systems (screws, bolts) with a bonded joint system using adhesive materials. The fitting element and component are joined through chemical bonding rather than mechanical interlocking, eliminating the need for threads, holes, and fastener installation while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes the mechanical fastener elements from the joint system. By designing a fitting element with integrated bonding surfaces and channels for adhesive distribution, the patent eliminates screws, bolts, and associated hardware, simplifying the overall joint structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Strength

If mechanical fasteners are used in high aspect ratio components, then mechanical strength is improved, but the difficulty of installation and accessibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical fastening operations with a simpler bonded joint process. The fitting element design includes features that facilitate adhesive application and distribution, allowing installation without the need for precise hole alignment, threading, or fastener tightening operations that are difficult in high aspect ratio components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The fitting element is pre-designed with integrated bonding surfaces and internal channels for adhesive distribution. This preliminary configuration of bonding features eliminates the need for on-site mechanical fastener installation, allowing the joint to be formed through simpler adhesive application and curing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If different materials (metallic and non-metallic) are joined, then design flexibility is improved, but the difficulty of achieving satisfactory joint strength increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial compatibilityVSAvoidjoint strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an adhesive material as an intermediary substance between dissimilar materials (metallic and non-metallic components). This adhesive mediator creates a chemical bond that bridges the interface between incompatible materials, allowing strength to be achieved through chemical adhesion rather than mechanical interlocking, which would be difficult across material boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs composite joint structures where the adhesive material creates a composite interface between dissimilar base materials. The fitting element itself may be constructed as a composite structure combining different materials to optimize bonding surfaces for various substrate types, enabling satisfactory joint strength across material boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a lightweight, strong, and durable joint that meets mechanical strength requirements without the need for internal mechanical fasteners, suitable for high-aspect ratio aircraft components.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more blades are bonded to the one or more spar fitting ends

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS12220877B2Component with monolithic structure having blind interface joint
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 ROHR INC
  • US12220877B2 patent drawing
  • US12220877B2 patent drawing
  • US12220877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component is provided that includes a monolithic structure and a fitting element. The monolithic structure includes first and second outer panels, and spars disposed between the first and second outer panels. The width of the monolithic structure extends between a fitting end and a distal end. The spars extend widthwise between the first and second outer panels. The spar fitting end of each spar has a Y-shaped configuration with first and second finger walls, and a channel disposed there between. Both the first and second finger walls have a divergent end and a distal end. The channel has a closed end and an open end defined at the finger wall distal ends. The fitting element has a body with one or more blades extending outwardly therefrom. Each blade is received in and mates with a spar fitting end channel and is bonded to the spar fitting end.