Blind Rivet with Plastic Body and Guide Element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blind rivets face challenges in uniform deformation during setting due to asymmetrical material stresses, leading to non-uniform contact with workpieces and limited holding and release forces, especially in applications like the automotive industry where easy removal is necessary without damaging surrounding components.

Innovation Solution

A blind rivet design featuring a guide element with radially inward projections and a conically expanding second region to ensure uniform deformation and secure mandrel locking, allowing for easy removal by reversing the mandrel and using a removal tool.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the rivet body is made of plastic with reduced wall thickness regions to enable deformation during setting, then the setting force efficiency and bead formation are improved, but the structural strength and resistance to damage during drilling-out deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetting force efficiencyVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rivet body features regions with different wall thicknesses: a first region with reduced wall thickness for deformation and bead formation, and a second region with greater wall thickness for strength and damage resistance. This local differentiation allows the rivet to simultaneously achieve easy setting and resistance to drilling-out damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the rivet body is designed to be removed in a single piece by reducing wall thickness, then the ease of removal is improved, but the holding forces and reliability of the joint deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of removalVSAvoidholding forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rivet body has a first region with reduced wall thickness that enables easy removal, while a second region with greater wall thickness maintains strong holding forces. This local differentiation allows the rivet to simultaneously achieve easy removal and reliable joint strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the mandrel is made of hard material for strong joining, then the joining strength is improved, but the difficulty of removing the rivet without damaging workpieces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoining strengthVSAvoiddamage to workpieces during removal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel is designed with a predetermined breaking point that has reduced cross-section and strength. During removal, the mandrel breaks at this predetermined point rather than damaging the workpiece, allowing easy removal while maintaining strong joining during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If the rivet body has asymmetric material stresses from molding, then the manufacturing ease is improved, but the uniformity of deformation and bead formation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding easeVSAvoiduniformity of deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rivet body is designed with intentional asymmetric features including a first region with reduced wall thickness and a second region with greater wall thickness. This asymmetric design compensates for asymmetric molding stresses, ensuring uniform deformation and consistent bead formation during setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures a uniform annular bead formation, enhances setting force efficiency, and allows for easy single-piece removal without damaging workpieces, while maintaining strong axial contact pressure and seal integrity.

Implementation Method 1

a mandrel head that stands in operative connection with the foot end of the rivet body in order to transmit a force to the rivet body during setting of the blind rivet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce transmission: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the rivet body deforms uniformly during setting of the blind rivet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

A blind rivet design featuring a guide element with radially inward projections and a conically expanding second region to ensure uniform deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 4

a conically expanding second region to ensure uniform deformation and secure mandrel locking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConical expansion: Geometry

Implementation Method 5

enhances setting force efficiency, and allows for easy single-piece removal without damaging workpieces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2748472B1Blind rivet with a plastic rivet body
Publication Date: 2015.12.16 NEWFREY LLC
  • EP2748472B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2748472B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2748472B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

In a blind rivet (10) having a hollow rivet body (11) made of plastic, having an elongated shank (13) with a bore (14), having a head (15) at one end of the shank and a foot end (19) on the opposite end of the shank (13), and having, located in the bore (14), a mandrel (12) that has a mandrel shank with a drawing end (38) and a mandrel head (35) that acts on the foot end (19), the shank (13) has a first region (21) located between the head (15) and the foot end (19), and has a second region (22) with reduced cross-section and reduced wall thickness as compared to the first region (21). The regions (21, 22) are arranged such that, as a result of a process in which the head (15) is pressed against one side of a workpiece and the foot end (19) is simultaneously drawn toward the other side of the workpiece with the aid of the mandrel (12), the wall of the shank (13) forms a roll fold with an annular bead. To avoid asymmetrical deformation, the shank (13) is guided by a guide element on the mandrel (12).