Blind Rivet Stem Locking Structure Against Recoil

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Blind rivets, particularly break-stem types, face issues with relative movement between the body and stem post-setting, leading to reduced fastening strength due to recoil or vibration, especially in large workpieces with high tensile strength stems.

Innovation Solution

A rivet design featuring a body and stem with locking features, where the head displaces relative to the shank to engage with the stem, utilizing a stem locking feature and a body locking feature to securely lock the stem in place, enhancing the fastening strength and preventing recoil.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a break-stem rivet is used to fasten workpiece members, then the fastening operation can be completed from one side (blind side), but the stem may recoil and move relative to the body after setting, reducing fastening strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblind side fastening capabilityVSAvoidfastening strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by incorporating a locking mechanism that prevents the stem from recoiling or moving relative to the body after setting. The locking feature creates a mechanical interlock that counteracts the natural tendency of the stem to move, thereby maintaining fastening strength while preserving blind side installation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the stem and body with distinct locking features - a locking feature on the stem and a corresponding locking feature in the body bore. This segmentation allows each component to have a specific function while working together to prevent relative movement, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional locking features are added to prevent stem recoil, then fastening strength is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastening strengthVSAvoidrivet structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding locking features only at specific locations - a locking feature on the stem and a corresponding locking feature in the body bore - rather than redesigning the entire rivet structure. This localized approach improves reliability while minimizing increases in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The locking feature on the stem fits into the locking feature in the body bore, creating a nested structure. This nesting approach allows the locking mechanism to be integrated within the existing rivet geometry, improving fastening strength without significantly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Strength

If the stem is made of high tensile strength material to handle large workpieces, then the fastening capacity is improved, but the stem becomes more prone to recoil

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastening capacityVSAvoidstem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by incorporating a locking mechanism that prevents the high-strength stem from recoiling after setting. The locking feature creates a mechanical interlock that counteracts the elastic recovery tendency of high-strength stem materials, allowing the use of high-tensile-strength materials for large workpiece applications without compromising stem stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a robust lock that improves the shear and tensile strength of the fastening, preventing stem recoil and vibration-induced loosening, while being simpler to manufacture and applicable to larger workpieces.

Implementation Method 1

the head of the body of the rivet undergoes displacement relative to the shank to engage with the stem to lock the stem in place relative to the body and/or the workpiece members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

an enlarged portion arranged for radially expanding the shank when the enlarged portion is forced into said bore to fasten the workpiece members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial expansion: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS11519443B2Rivets
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 AVDEL UK LTD
  • US11519443B2 patent drawing
  • US11519443B2 patent drawing
  • US11519443B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rivet for fastening workpiece members, the rivet including a body comprising a shank extending in a first, longitudinal direction and a head extending in a second, substantially transversal direction, a bore being defined through the shank and the head of the body; and, a stem comprising a main longitudinal portion arranged for insertion into said bore, and an enlarged portion arranged for radially expanding the shank when the enlarged portion is forced into said bore to fasten the workpiece members; the rivet being configured for insertion into respective apertures formed in the workpiece members; and the rivet being further configured such that when the workpiece members are fastened, the head of the body of the rivet is displaced relative to the shank to engage with the stem to lock the stem in place relative to the body and/or the workpiece members.