Block Copolymer Nanofiller Composites Phase Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current polymer/nanofiller systems face challenges in achieving regular arrangement of nanofillers within polymer matrices, limiting the potential of polymer nanocomposites in applications such as separation processes and photonic devices, due to the lack of understanding in controlling the phase-separation of copolymers and the effects of nanofillers on their microdomains.

Innovation Solution

The use of block copolymers combined with nanoscale fillers, where the surface chemistry of the fillers is modified to chemically tether or interact with the copolymers through hydrogen bonds or van der Waals forces, allowing control over the self-assembly of phase-separated microdomains and thus the overall properties of the copolymers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If nanofillers are added to polymer matrices, then strength and mechanical properties are improved, but regular arrangement of nanofillers cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidregular arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses block copolymers as intermediaries between nanofillers and polymer matrices. The block copolymers have selective compatibility with nanofillers, acting as mediators that guide nanofiller arrangement into regular patterns while maintaining strength improvements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameter of the polymer system by introducing block copolymers with specific block ratios and compositions. This parameter change enables control over nanofiller-polymer interactions, achieving both regular arrangement and improved strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If block copolymers are used with nanofillers, then ordering of nanofillers is achieved, but control over bulk morphology is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveordering of nanofillersVSAvoidcontrol over bulk morphology
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies multiple parameters including block copolymer composition, block ratio, molecular weight, and nanofiller concentration to achieve comprehensive control over bulk morphology while maintaining nanofiller ordering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates different microdomain structures in different regions of the bulk material by adjusting block copolymer parameters. This enables local control over morphology while maintaining overall ordering, enhancing adaptability for different applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If surface chemistry of nanofillers is modified, then interactions with copolymers are controlled, but complexity of surface modification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over interactionsVSAvoidsurface modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls interactions by adjusting the chemical composition and structure parameters of surface modifiers rather than through complex multi-step modifications. This achieves versatile control over copolymer-nanofiller interactions while keeping the modification process relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the modification of the microstructure and mechanical properties of block copolymers, such as polyurethane, by adjusting the modulus and glass transition temperature, expanding their industrial applications through controlled nanofiller selection and surface chemistry.

Implementation Method 1

the surface chemistry of the fillers is modified to chemically tether or through other means (such as hydrogen bonds or van der Waals forces) control the interactions between the copolymers and the nanofillers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen bonds: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

the surface chemistry of the fillers is modified to chemically tether or through other means (such as hydrogen bonds or van der Waals forces) control the interactions between the copolymers and the nanofillers

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectvan der Waals forces: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 3

The molecular chains of block copolymers have different segments that can self-assemble to form phase-separated microdomains

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembly: Self-Assembly

Data Source

PatentUS8974915B2Block copolymer and nanofiller composites
Publication Date: 2015.03.10 RENESSELAER POLYTECHNIC INST
  • US8974915B2 patent drawing
  • US8974915B2 patent drawing
  • US8974915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

PU/ZnO nanocomposites are provided wherein the addition of less than 1 vol % 33 nm ZnO nanoparticles into a PU matrix effect a decrease in the Young's Modulus and storage modulus of the polymer, while simultaneously effecting an increase glass transition temperature of the polymer. Detailed experiments are described (e.g., FTIR, DMTA, FESEM and AFM) that suggest that the reaction between hydroxyl groups of the ZnO nanoparticles and isocyanate groups of the polyurethane prepolymer disrupts the self-assembly of the phase separation in PU. Phase separation is responsible for the good mechanical properties of PU. Further, detailed experiments suggest that the increase of the glass transition temperature results from the crosslinking effect of the ZnO nanoparticles.