Block-Based Image Compression Using Edge-Aware Frequency Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing devices face challenges in achieving a high compression rate while maintaining image quality, particularly in distinguishing between different types of image data such as text and natural images, which affects memory storage and transmission efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device that divides input image data into blocks, determines the type of each block based on edge elements, converts color components into frequency components, and compresses the data by identifying and suppressing unnecessary frequency components specific to each type, using techniques like discrete cosine transform (DCT) and pattern matching for text images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lossless compression processing is used for text images, then image quality is maintained, but compression rate is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcompression rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different compression strategies to different regions of the image based on local characteristics. Text regions undergo lossless compression to maintain sharp edges and character definitions, while natural image regions use lossy compression to achieve higher compression rates. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing high compression rates overall while maintaining quality where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The image is divided into multiple blocks, and each block is independently analyzed and compressed according to its specific characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to identify text blocks versus natural image blocks and apply appropriate compression methods to each, thereby achieving both high compression rates and maintained quality in text regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If lossy compression processing is used for natural images, then compression rate increases, but image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression rateVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Lossy compression is applied selectively only to natural image regions where quality degradation is less perceptible, while text regions are protected with lossless compression. This resolves the contradiction by confining quality deterioration to areas where it matters least while maximizing compression rates in those same areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the image into text and natural image blocks, the patent can apply lossy compression only to the natural image portions, achieving high overall compression rates without significantly impacting perceived image quality since text regions maintain their sharpness and definition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If image data is processed as a whole, then processing is simple, but compression rate is reduced due to inability to differentiate image types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidcompression rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image into multiple blocks and processes each block independently after identifying its type. This segmentation enables differentiation between text and natural image regions, allowing the system to achieve high compression rates by applying appropriate methods to each segment while keeping the overall processing framework relatively simple and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If edge detection is performed for every block to determine image type, then compression accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage type determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs edge detection and image type determination only for necessary blocks rather than uniformly processing every block with the same level of analysis. This partial action approach maintains high compression accuracy by identifying image types where it matters most while reducing processing time by avoiding redundant analysis in already-identified regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8280159B2Methods and devices for compressing an image
Publication Date: 2012.10.02 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8280159B2 patent drawing
  • US8280159B2 patent drawing
  • US8280159B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing device that processes input image data includes: an image dividing unit that divides the input image data into a plurality of blocks; an image type determining unit that determines the type of the input image data for every block on the basis of the number of edge elements included in the block; a frequency component conversion unit that converts color components of the input image data into frequency components for every block; and an image compression unit that compresses corresponding image data for every block by specifying unnecessary components of the converted frequency components of the image data on the basis of the determined type of the image data and suppressing or removing the specified unnecessary components.