Block Storage Workload Analysis via Operation Delta Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing block storage systems lack a rigorous method to classify read and write operations as sequential or random, which affects system performance, and there is a need to optimize the placement of customer volumes based on historical operational data to minimize latency.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system that uses formal parameters to determine the sequentiality or randomness of operations by calculating deltas between adjacent operations and analyzing latency, allowing for more granular classification and informed placement decisions across multiple block storage devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If block storage systems use traditional classification methods for read and write operations, then the system structure remains simple, but the measurement precision of operation types is insufficient leading to suboptimal performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precision of operationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing formal parameters (delta calculations between adjacent operations, latency measurements) to transform the classification system from intuitive to rigorous. This enables precise distinction between sequential and random operations through quantitative metrics rather than qualitative judgments, directly resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/intuitive classification system with a computational analysis system that uses formal parameters and algorithms to determine operation types. This substitution enables more precise classification through mathematical calculations (delta between operations, latency analysis) while managing complexity through systematic computational approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If block storage systems implement intuitive classification of operations, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the productivity of the system is limited due to insufficient optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing operation patterns, calculating deltas between adjacent operations, measuring latencies, and classifying operations as sequential or random without external intervention. This automated rigorous analysis improves productivity while maintaining ease of operation, as the classification happens autonomously based on formal parameters rather than requiring manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by measuring latencies of operations and using this information to refine the classification of operations as sequential or random. The system continuously monitors operation patterns and uses latency feedback to improve classification accuracy, thereby enhancing system performance while maintaining operational simplicity through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If block storage systems lack rigorous operation classification, then the device complexity is low, but the loss of time occurs due to inability to optimize operation placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation latencyVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing rigorous classification analysis of operation patterns before placing customer volumes on block storage devices. The system pre-calculates delta values between adjacent operations, measures latencies, and determines whether operations are sequential or random in advance, enabling optimized placement decisions that minimize latency while managing complexity through upfront analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the analysis process into distinct components: calculating deltas between adjacent operations, measuring latencies, classifying operations as sequential or random, and making placement decisions. This segmentation of the analysis system reduces complexity by breaking down the rigorous classification task into manageable, modular steps that can be executed systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9830256B1Block device workload analysis
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9830256B1 patent drawing
  • US9830256B1 patent drawing
  • US9830256B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for formally expressing whether sequences of operations performed on block storage devices are sequential or random. In embodiments, determinations of whether these sequences of operations are sequential or random may be used to predict latencies involved with running particular workloads, and to predict representative workloads for particular latencies.