Blockchain Agreement Platform Template Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating legal agreements are often costly, time-consuming, and lack customization options, making it difficult for parties to ensure clarity and enforceability without legal oversight.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a blockchain-based platform to facilitate the creation, validation, and recording of agreements, allowing parties to generate agreements based on templates, obtain signatures, and post the agreements to a blockchain for secure storage and validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional legal agreement creation methods are used, then agreements can be drafted and reviewed, but the process is costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagreement creation timeVSAvoidagreement creation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses template copying where pre-drafted agreement templates are replicated and customized for different parties. The system stores standardized agreement templates and allows automatic generation of new agreements by copying and adapting existing templates, significantly reducing the time and cost of creating legal agreements while maintaining professional quality through template-based consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-drafting and pre-reviewing agreement templates before they are needed. Legal professionals prepare standardized templates in advance that include essential clauses and terminology, so that when new agreements are needed, the system can quickly generate customized versions from these pre-prepared templates rather than starting from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional legal agreement creation methods are used, then agreements can be drafted, but they lack customization options and clarity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagreement customizationVSAvoidagreement clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by allowing the agreement templates to be dynamically customized for each specific situation. The system enables users to modify template parameters, select different template versions, and adapt clauses to match specific business needs while maintaining the structured framework. This dynamic customization ensures both versatility and clarity by allowing tailored agreements that clearly reflect the specific parties' intentions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system provides real-time validation and review of agreement terms. Users receive feedback on whether their customizations maintain legal compliance and clarity, and the system can highlight potential issues or suggest improvements. This feedback loop ensures that customized agreements remain clear and enforceable while adapting to specific situations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If traditional legal agreement creation methods are used, then agreements can be drafted, but they lack enforceability without legal oversight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagreement enforceabilityVSAvoidlegal oversight requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling users to independently draft, customize, and generate legally enforceable agreements without requiring continuous legal oversight. The system provides built-in legal validation, automatic clause generation, and compliance checking that allows users to create enforceable agreements autonomously. This self-service approach maintains reliability through standardized legal frameworks while reducing the complexity of requiring constant legal intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If blockchain-based agreement recording is implemented, then secure and transparent records are provided, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecord securityVSAvoidblockchain system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary approach where a blockchain service layer abstracts the complexity of blockchain technology from the user interface. The system incorporates blockchain recording as a standardized service that handles cryptographic operations, transaction validation, and immutable storage automatically. This intermediary layer provides secure and transparent records while shielding users from the underlying technical complexity through simplified integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250030562A1System to facilitate blockchain-based agreements
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 SAASY LABS INC
  • US20250030562A1 patent drawing
  • US20250030562A1 patent drawing
  • US20250030562A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Agreements between parties are facilitated using templates in a system that validates and verifies the agreements to improve clarity or enforceability of the agreements. Blockchain methods are used such that the agreements may be properly recorded or stored. The method may include providing a template of an agreement and obtaining an agreement between a first entity and a second entity. The agreement is generated based on the first template and user input. The agreement is added to an agreement chain. A block that includes information associated with the agreement is submitted to be posted to a blockchain.