Blockchain Cooperative Voting System for Fund Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Informal cooperative societies in Eastern Africa face inefficiencies due to lack of documentation, leading to issues like embezzlement, mismanagement, and time-consuming physical meetings, which hinder large transactions and resource management.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a blockchain system for cooperative societies to store member registrations, proposals, votes, and actions, utilizing smart contracts for automatic transactions and reducing the need for physical meetings by allowing member participation through computing devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If informal cooperative societies operate without official documentation, then they can maintain flexibility and ease of operation, but they become vulnerable to embezzlement, mismanagement, and lack of transparency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidfund security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of all cooperative society operations on a blockchain ledger. Every transaction, vote, and proposal is recorded as an immutable digital copy that cannot be altered, providing both the flexibility of informal operation and the reliability of documented records. The blockchain serves as a trusted copy mechanism that eliminates the need for physical documentation while ensuring transparency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If physical meetings are held for all cooperative society actions, then all members can participate directly in decisions, but it consumes significant time and resources, especially over large distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemember participationVSAvoidmeeting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical gatherings with a digital blockchain-based voting and proposal system. Members can submit proposals, vote, and track decisions through computing devices connected to the blockchain network, eliminating the need for physical meetings while maintaining full member participation. The blockchain consensus mechanism ensures all decisions are valid without requiring physical presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If more nodes are added to the blockchain network, then the system becomes more decentralized and secure, but the computational requirements and bandwidth limitations increase, making the chain longer and harder to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedecentralizationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the blockchain network into specialized nodes with specific functions. Rather than requiring all nodes to process all transactions equally, the system divides responsibilities among different node types, reducing the computational burden on each individual node while maintaining overall network security and decentralization. This segmentation allows more nodes to participate without proportionally increasing complexity for each participant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250007729A1Method and system for blockchain-based cooperative society transactions
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US20250007729A1 patent drawing
  • US20250007729A1 patent drawing
  • US20250007729A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for implementing a cooperative society through a blockchain with participation via computing devices includes: storing, in a blockchain node, a blockchain comprised of a plurality of blocks, each block including a block header and one or more blockchain data values, where at least one of the blockchain data values includes proposal data including at least a proposal identifier; receiving a vote message from each of a plurality of registered computing devices including the proposal identifier and an affirmative or negative vote; determining a proposal result based on a number of affirmative votes being above a predetermined threshold; generating a new block including a new block header and at least one new blockchain data value, the at least one new blockchain data value including the proposal result; and performing one or more actions based on data included in the proposal data.