Blockchain Smart Contracts for Fund Administration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The administration and governance of international development and humanitarian aid funds face challenges such as fraud, waste, and inefficiencies due to traditional banking systems, leading to a loss of up to 30% of allocated funds and erosion of trust among donors and recipient countries.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented process using a permissioned blockchain smart contracts platform and cryptocurrency system that enables secure, transparent, and efficient transfer of funds by allowing participants to access and manage cryptocurrency transactions, with smart contracts automating and restricting transfers to prevent fraud and abuse, while integrating with traditional banking systems for fiat conversions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional banking systems are used for fund transfer, then security and trust are maintained through established protocols, but transaction speed and cost efficiency deteriorate due to intermediaries and processing delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a blockchain-based intermediary layer that mediates between traditional banking systems and fund recipients. This blockchain intermediary enables direct peer-to-peer transactions while maintaining security through cryptographic protocols, thereby increasing transaction speed without completely abandoning the security framework of traditional banking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential security and trust functions from traditional banking intermediaries and implements them through blockchain smart contracts. By taking out the intermediary role and replacing it with automated, transparent blockchain protocols, the system achieves faster transactions while maintaining appropriate security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If traditional banking intermediaries are used, then fraud prevention is achieved through established verification processes, but fund loss to fraud and waste increases due to inefficiencies and corruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidfund loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback mechanisms through blockchain's transparent ledger system. Every transaction is recorded, tracked, and visible to authorized participants in real-time, enabling immediate detection and prevention of fraudulent activities. This continuous feedback loop reduces fund loss by allowing rapid response to suspicious transactions while maintaining strong fraud prevention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs smart contracts that automatically execute transactions and enforce rules without human intervention. This self-service mechanism eliminates opportunities for corruption and manual errors, maintaining high reliability in fraud prevention while minimizing fund loss through automated, transparent execution of predetermined conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If manual fund management processes are used, then governance control is maintained through human oversight, but administrative efficiency and transparency deteriorate due to manual processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadministrative efficiencyVSAvoidtransparency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual administrative processes with automated blockchain smart contracts and digital systems. This substitution eliminates manual processing bottlenecks, dramatically improving administrative efficiency while simultaneously enhancing transparency through the blockchain's immutable and transparent ledger that records all transactions visible to authorized participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a blockchain-based information intermediary layer that maintains transparent records of all fund transactions. This intermediary system preserves governance control by providing auditable trails and real-time visibility to authorized stakeholders, while eliminating the information loss and opacity associated with manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If permissioned blockchain smart contracts are implemented, then transparency and fraud prevention are improved through automated rules, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex blockchain system into distinct functional modules: permission management, smart contract execution, transaction validation, and ledger maintenance. By dividing the system into these manageable segments, the patent reduces implementation complexity while maintaining the reliability benefits of automated fraud prevention rules in each module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11010729B2Cryptoconomy solution for administration and governance in a distributed system
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 PWC PRODUCT SALES LLC
  • US11010729B2 patent drawing
  • US11010729B2 patent drawing
  • US11010729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented process, system, and computer readable medium are provided for administration and governance of fiat and cryptocurrency funds in a distributed computer system. In one example, a process includes, at an electronic device with one or more processors and memory, accessing a list of a plurality of participant nodes, which may include a fund administrator receiving a list of participants or nodes. The method further includes transferring crypto-currency (e.g., that is pegged to U.S. dollars, local currency, or the like) to one or more of the participant nodes. Each of the participant nodes may include an interface portal (e.g., a web-portal) for viewing transferred crypto-currency and for transacting (e.g., bidding, soliciting, etc.) with other participant nodes of the list of participant nodes with the crypto-currency.