Blockchain Biosecurity for Genetic Sequence Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current DNA printing processes lack secure and transparent methods for managing permissions and regulating genetic sequence printing, which can lead to unauthorized and potentially hazardous printing tasks.

Innovation Solution

A blockchain-based biosecurity control system that integrates distributed ledger technology to manage permissions for genetic sequence printing tasks, ensuring that all transactions are secure, transparent, and immutable, preventing unauthorized printing without corresponding blockchain records.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional centralized permission management is used for DNA printing, then ease of operation is maintained, but security and transparency of genetic sequence printing are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces blockchain technology as an intermediary layer between users and DNA printing systems. The blockchain ledger acts as a neutral mediator that records and verifies all printing transactions immutably, providing cryptographic proof of authorization without requiring complex centralized trust relationships. This resolves the contradiction by enhancing security through decentralized verification while maintaining operational simplicity for end users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/centralized permission management systems with cryptographic verification mechanisms. Instead of relying on centralized databases and administrative controls, the system uses blockchain-based cryptographic signatures and smart contracts to automatically verify printing permissions. This substitution enhances security through mathematical proofs while simplifying the operational complexity by automating verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If blockchain technology is implemented for permission management, then transparency and security of genetic sequence printing are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetransparencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages the inherent copying mechanism of blockchain technology, where the distributed ledger is replicated across multiple nodes. Each node maintains an identical copy of the transaction history, providing automatic transparency and auditability. This copying approach enhances transparency without requiring complex centralized monitoring systems, as the distributed nature of blockchain inherently provides verification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the blockchain system to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it serves as a permission verification mechanism, an audit trail, a transaction registry, and a trust establishment layer. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what would otherwise require separate systems into a single unified blockchain infrastructure that handles transparency, security, and tracking collectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If permission verification is performed through multiple blockchain nodes, then security against unauthorized printing is enhanced, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-registering DNA printing permissions and authorized sequences in the blockchain ledger before actual printing occurs. Smart contracts are预先 configured with permission rules and authorization criteria. When a printing request is made, nodes can quickly verify against pre-established rules rather than performing complex real-time analysis, significantly reducing verification time while maintaining high authorization accuracy through the immutability of pre-registered permissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If distributed ledger technology is used to manage printing permissions, then unauthorized printing is prevented, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectivenessVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where users can independently verify printing permissions and transaction status through the blockchain ledger without requiring manual intervention from administrators. The system provides user-friendly interfaces that automatically query the blockchain for permission status and display results. This self-service approach maintains control effectiveness through cryptographic verification while improving ease of operation by eliminating bureaucratic friction and manual approval processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250150279A1Biosecurity control system based on blockchain technology for regulation and monitoring the printing of genetic sequences
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 PREPAIRE LABS LTD
  • US20250150279A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150279A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150279A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising receiving a transaction request to print a genetic sequence, the transaction request including an account and a key, a state of the account managed by a blockchain where a plurality of copies of the blockchain include a state of the account; retrieving a stored key associated with the account; authenticating the transaction request based on the stored key and the transaction request key; determining a state of the account in a first copy of the blockchain is the same as in at least a second copy of the blockchain; validating the transaction request based on the determining a state of the account in a first copy of the plurality of copies of the blockchain is the same as in at least a second copy of the plurality of copies of the blockchain; and authorizing the transaction request based on the authentication and validation of the transaction request.