Blockchain Verification Using Genomic Differentiation Objects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cybersecurity solutions are inadequate in addressing the hyper-scalability dilemma, failing to effectively distinguish between noble and nefarious activities in digital ecosystems, and are vulnerable to quantum computer-assisted cryptanalysis and AI-informed subversive algorithms, leading to catastrophic cyber-attacks and privacy assaults.

Innovation Solution

Cyphergenics (CG) technology employs computationally complex genomic constructions to enable hyper-scalability, generating information theory-constructed genomic constructions that can be regulated, preserving computational integrity and allowing for virtual unboundedness, authentication, and secure data exchange without compromising interoperability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cryptography and security technologies are used, then basic security functions are provided, but they fail to achieve hyper-scalability and are vulnerable to quantum computer-assisted cryptanalysis and AI-informed subversive algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidhyper-scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms cryptographic security from a static parameter-based system to a dynamic genomic construction system. By changing the fundamental parameter from fixed cryptographic keys to regulable genomic constructions with controlled entropy, the system achieves both enhanced security reliability and hyper-scalability. The genomic constructions can be dynamically regulated to adapt to different security requirements and scale across digital ecosystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/cryptoographic security mechanisms with a biologically-inspired genomic system. Instead of relying on mathematical hardness assumptions vulnerable to quantum attacks, the system uses digitally embodied genomic constructions that leverage biological principles of mutation, regulation, and evolution to provide quantum-resistant security that scales hyper-exponentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If cryptographic-based security is deployed to protect digital ecosystems, then security coverage increases, but computational overhead and bandwidth requirements increase linearly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions security from linear scaling (one-to-many) to hyper-scaling (many-to-many) by introducing a new dimensional framework. Genomic constructions enable N digital cohorts to directly establish mutual identity with N different cohorts simultaneously, creating an N×N security matrix that scales hyper-exponentially rather than linearly, thereby reducing per-connection computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The genomic constructions serve multiple security functions simultaneously - authentication, authorization, encryption, and integrity verification - within a single unified framework. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate cryptographic protocols for each security operation, reducing overall computational overhead and bandwidth requirements while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If digital ecosystems expand with more cohorts and interactions, then functionality and interoperability improve, but security verification becomes increasingly complex and computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinteroperabilityVSAvoidsecurity verification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The genomic construction system enables digital cohorts to autonomously verify mutual identity and establish security contexts without external intervention. Each cohort possesses the capability to self-verify against others through shared genomic constructions, eliminating the need for centralized certificate authorities or complex trust management infrastructure, thereby reducing verification complexity as the ecosystem scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs security verification in advance by pre-establishing genomic construction relationships between digital cohorts. Mutual identity and trust contexts are prepared beforehand through genomic linkage, allowing rapid verification during actual interactions without complex real-time computation, thus reducing operational complexity in large-scale ecosystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11615323B2Cyphergenics-based verifications of blockchains
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 QUANTUM DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US11615323B2 patent drawing
  • US11615323B2 patent drawing
  • US11615323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for verifying a material data chain (MDC) that is maintained by a creator is disclosed. The method includes receiving an unverified portion of the MDC from the creator including a set of consecutive material data blocks (MDBs). Each respective MDB includes respective material data, respective metadata, and a creator verification value. The method includes modifying a genomic differentiation object assigned to the verification cohort based on first genomic regulation instructions (GRI) that were used by the creator to generate the creator verification value. For each MDB in the unverified portion, the method includes determining a verifier verification value based on the MDB, a preceding MDB in the MDC, and a genomic engagement factor (GEF) determined with respect to the MDB. The GEF corresponding to an MDB is determined by extracting a sequence from the metadata of a MDB and mapping the sequence into the modified genomic differentiation object.